From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14201 invoked by uid 1002); 1 Jul 2003 12:12:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 373 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2003 12:12:22 -0000 Message-ID: <3F017AC0.9060906@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 08:12:48 -0400 From: Stewart Honsberger Organization: Snerk World Enterprises User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030617 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20030701025824.64ecc18a.seemant@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030701025824.64ecc18a.seemant@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Interest Check: Dynamic config files for portage X-Archives-Salt: 5a5c2b24-7172-497a-a220-304c6b5db13f X-Archives-Hash: b8ac51f762ee96148bf59602d2ba862c Seemant Kulleen wrote: [..Quote trimmed Re: make.conf.d, line wrap seems absent..] Sounds like a good idea to me, actually. make.conf is getting rather long winded and I only forsee it getting longer with every major Portage update, and like many others, I rue updating it, opting instead to manually add new directives and hope they're self-explanatory enough for down the road. :> -- Stewart Honsberger Gentoo Developer http://www.snerk.org/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list