From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j575ewxH025176
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 05:40:58 GMT
Received: from [10.21.12.197] (c-67-188-97-211.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.97.211])
by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP
id <2005060705412201100etqe2e>; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 05:41:22 +0000
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730)
In-Reply-To: <20050606235550.GL9084@kaf.zko.hp.com>
References: <20050606235550.GL9084@kaf.zko.hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <3EED4E38-BB6B-40E3-AA0A-FA104DECF533@comcast.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: James Northrup <glamdring-inc@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo?
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:41:20 -0700
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730)
X-Archives-Salt: fd722808-f80f-48d3-b829-5fbec03f2ef8
X-Archives-Hash: 4e41d5d904551972897f03afee18d377
On Jun 6, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Aron Griffis wrote:
> This is kinda bloggish, because it's basically a transcription of an
> IRC monologue. My apologies if it's hard to follow... Nonetheless,
> I'm interested in how other developers feel on the topics I bring up
> below.
overlay capabilities are understated.
The use of USE flags might someday emerge overlays which open up the
gateway to ricer heaven for one group while an entirely seperate
group does in fact bolt down RHEL analogs in function and process.
Does the growth of metadata processing overhead exceed moore's law?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list