From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j575ewxH025176 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 05:40:58 GMT Received: from [10.21.12.197] (c-67-188-97-211.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.97.211]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2005060705412201100etqe2e>; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 05:41:22 +0000 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) In-Reply-To: <20050606235550.GL9084@kaf.zko.hp.com> References: <20050606235550.GL9084@kaf.zko.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <3EED4E38-BB6B-40E3-AA0A-FA104DECF533@comcast.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: James Northrup Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo? Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:41:20 -0700 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-Archives-Salt: fd722808-f80f-48d3-b829-5fbec03f2ef8 X-Archives-Hash: 4e41d5d904551972897f03afee18d377 On Jun 6, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Aron Griffis wrote: > This is kinda bloggish, because it's basically a transcription of an > IRC monologue. My apologies if it's hard to follow... Nonetheless, > I'm interested in how other developers feel on the topics I bring up > below. overlay capabilities are understated. The use of USE flags might someday emerge overlays which open up the gateway to ricer heaven for one group while an entirely seperate group does in fact bolt down RHEL analogs in function and process. Does the growth of metadata processing overhead exceed moore's law? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list