From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1620 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Jun 2003 02:52:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21436 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2003 02:52:40 -0000 Message-ID: <3EEA8DE5.70609@tkdack.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:52:21 +1000 From: Troy Dack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <1055531969.477.9.camel@debian> In-Reply-To: <1055531969.477.9.camel@debian> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ccache X-Archives-Salt: 39b2c3a4-f7b0-4798-8750-a638a3530596 X-Archives-Hash: a71143dd1052ec6f14aab552caf65649 Hasse Hagen Johansen wrote: >Hi > >A couple of days ago it was recommended on this list to use ccache. I >have now tried ccache, and I think it breaks some builds horrible. As of >now I have tried to build mozilla-1.3-r2, and jack-cvs. Those packages >fail with an error that the linker parser cannot understand the format >of one of the object files. I think it would be a very good idea not >have the ccache flag enabled by default it simply breaks normally >working ebuilds. I think that it should be something you can set in your >use flags if you know what you are doing. > >Comments welcome. It could be me just to stupid to use ccache ;-) > >Regards >Hasse > > > It is a setting you can put in your FEATURES in /etc/make.conf I've never had any problems with ccache, in fact I built mozilla-1.3 the other day with it (and distcc) and my ccache is shared via nfs between 3 machines. I probably shouldn't share the cache, but it hasn't hurt yet! Troy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list