From: Norbert Kamenicky <noro@xmedia.sk>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Strange behavior of rc scripts
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 16:46:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EE0A95F.8020406@xmedia.sk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306061713130.21795-100000@hercules.dustbite.org>
leio@hercules.dustbite.org wrote:
>On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Norbert Kamenicky wrote:
>
>
>
>>On unixes it's quite common, that if some daemon started from
>>init rc scripts fails, it's possible to re/start it paintless by hand
>>again ...
>>( but not on Gentoo ? )
>>
>>
>
>If a service is not running but the init system thinks it is, you just
>need to zap it, just as suggested in the initscripts helpfile (I believe
>it was /etc/init.d/<a initscript> help but I could remember wrong, not at
>home and forced to use MS Windows atm :( )
>
>/etc/init.d/<initscript> zap
>
>
>
>>When I switched from RH to Gentoo, the first thing
>>I was worry about were rc init scripts, because I can
>>only hardly to imagine something better then system 5 ones...
>>let's try to convince me I am wrong :-)
>>
>>
>
>Gentoo initscripts are just about perfect and work is in progress to make
>it even more perfect (if I recall correct then the initscript system is
>being developed to hold initscript dependencies in a tree so that multiple
>services can be started to increase boot-up time heavily)
>If you cared to read the docs from gentoo.org you wouldn't ask about it.
>http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/rc-scripts.xml which is directly linked from
>the docs link on gentoo homepage.
>Also such questions do NOT go to the gentoo-dev mailing list.
>
>Mart Raudsepp
>
Yeah, I know, I have to use "zap", but I can't understand
what is the advantage of this complication ...
Perfect is something, which is simple and easy to use ... (KISS)
can you imagine, new Mercedes (automatic gearbox equiped)
with an extra clutch ?
Noro
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-06 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-06 13:42 [gentoo-dev] Strange behavior of rc scripts Norbert Kamenicky
2003-06-06 14:20 ` leio
2003-06-06 14:46 ` Norbert Kamenicky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EE0A95F.8020406@xmedia.sk \
--to=noro@xmedia.sk \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox