From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14562 invoked by uid 1002); 1 Jun 2003 17:50:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 29567 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2003 17:50:27 -0000 Message-ID: <3EDA3CBC.7080604@snerk.org> Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 13:49:48 -0400 From: Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200305312304.58896.nbensa@gmx.net> <1054468972.18656.0.camel@wolf.codewordt.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1054468972.18656.0.camel@wolf.codewordt.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage's changelog X-Archives-Salt: 5c5a1e12-8e08-4bce-8702-9c94ec0139b4 X-Archives-Hash: 960211c4c2cdc2ca8c853e78d6b3afdb Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: >>Is it that hard to include a changelog like any other ebuild??? > > http://cvs.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gentoo-src/portage/ChangeLog?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup > > It's also more comprehensive than traditional 'Changelog' entries > usually are. It would, however, be nice to see a ChangeLog file summarizing the major differences and caveats of the major upgrades. -- http://www.snerk.org/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list