From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23053 invoked by uid 1002); 22 May 2003 05:24:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 30655 invoked from network); 22 May 2003 05:24:29 -0000 Message-ID: <3ECC5F1E.20807@brad-x.com> Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 01:24:46 -0400 From: Brad Laue User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030430 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Nielsen Cc: Gentoo-Dev References: <1053297190.10127.69.camel@nosferatu.lan> <1053329547.5521.6.camel@pilot.stavtrup-st.dk> In-Reply-To: <1053329547.5521.6.camel@pilot.stavtrup-st.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.3.2-r2 X-Archives-Salt: 50ba3f95-47dc-44d4-8505-3237bd3b18cf X-Archives-Hash: e4656e96bf0e1a12cc1248182e4a3e03 David Nielsen wrote: > I do believe that RedHat 9 ships with a 2.4 kernel that is able to run > NPTL, so there should be no need use 2.5 if we could get those patches > in gentoo-sources. Might not be worth the trouble though. There is actually a redhat-sources kernel containing 2.4.20-8, their RedHat 9, NPTL enabled tree; I've not seen anyone try using this kernel with Gentoo though; anyone out there who's tried it? Brad -- // -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ -- // -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list