From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20715 invoked by uid 1002); 26 Apr 2003 14:28:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12624 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2003 14:28:19 -0000 Message-ID: <3EAA9668.9030009@home.se> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 22:23:36 +0800 From: Daniel Armyr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030401 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20030424071630.GB4566@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> <20030424125034.692a486c.spider@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030424125034.692a486c.spider@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.71.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new USE flag: EXIF X-Archives-Salt: 56bed5e8-7851-4374-9aad-eeb44670a741 X-Archives-Hash: 278c1309a4f57f8d5c2cb676b5229a07 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 |>line for use.desc: |>exif - Adds support for handling EXIF data | question, exif, is that the extended jpeg format, or am I on the wrong | track here? How about adding amention of the fact that exif is an extension to jpeg in the desc. The line given is fairly redundant if you know what exif is, and quite pointless if you don't. //Daniel Armyr - -- ========================================= daniel.armyr@home.se f00-dar@f.kth.se C118 KEVII Hall 1A Kent Ridge Rd S.119224 Singapore PGP@pgp.mit.edu ========================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+qpZnhxtTUWLs2lERAoK+AJ4hHC0fzazcsfKLi5K1LfFn9YqsRACcCrFK QbVD/Zqa5JXCyIPK/dmx9eE= =9aVo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list