From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20953 invoked by uid 1002); 26 Apr 2003 00:36:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 32211 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2003 00:36:58 -0000 Message-ID: <3EA9D506.30404@foser.dyn.warande.net> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 02:38:30 +0200 From: foser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <1050997108.2986.28.camel@amd.vsen.dk> <1051016369.4102.46.camel@entropy> <200304221726.35741.danarmak@gentoo.org> <3EA9692C.4040109@brad-x.com> <3EA97106.10807@foser.dyn.warande.net> <3EA9A28C.8080902@brad-x.com> In-Reply-To: <3EA9A28C.8080902@brad-x.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.73.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuilds not getting in :( X-Archives-Salt: 24a52fdc-44ff-47d1-8d0f-fec34a93692b X-Archives-Hash: 4e51bdbc59b9a019134c48ef7825553a Brad Laue wrote: > About apache though, 2.0.45 is presented as the latest available version > in portage when using the ~x86 keyword, whereas 1.3.27 is present when > one uses the x86 keyword. > > Is this a coincidence, in that 2.x will be marked stable at some point > and all keywords will report it as the latest available version, in the > same way apache.org recommends? Well yeah sorta, it's just the way portage works : get the latest stable version available (that also means the highest slot most likely). If you want the latest 1.x version just do 'emerge =apache-1* -p' or something similar. In time it would probably be a nice feature to give a slot number with the emerge command or something. But this isn't really -dev worthy traffic ;) - foser -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list