From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11593 invoked by uid 1002); 26 Apr 2003 00:28:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 7465 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2003 00:28:32 -0000 Message-ID: <3EA9D30D.7020304@foser.dyn.warande.net> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 02:30:05 +0200 From: foser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20030425T150719Z_B95E00150000@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030425T150719Z_B95E00150000@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.73.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Several portage trees X-Archives-Salt: 3a945e41-43fc-42db-a1f9-840657cce972 X-Archives-Hash: b880fb3364cce0607b941d22dc28103f Joshua Brindle wrote: > > you aren't even listening > the problem is that it isn't easy to know what causes the bug, and i can > see countless hours being spent by Gentoo devs tracking down a bug that > they find out later is caused by an unrelated ebuild in a 3rd party tree, > don't tell me it won't happen, I know better. > All these points i brought up in my first mail. Why does everything needs saying twice or even thrice (reading trough this thread is one deja-vu after the other). (this is not directed @ you method, but at the thread as whole) - foser -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list