From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19801 invoked by uid 1002); 25 Apr 2003 21:04:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27494 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2003 21:04:20 -0000 Message-ID: <3EA9A28C.8080902@brad-x.com> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:03:08 -0400 From: Brad Laue User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030422 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: foser Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <1050997108.2986.28.camel@amd.vsen.dk> <1051016369.4102.46.camel@entropy> <200304221726.35741.danarmak@gentoo.org> <3EA9692C.4040109@brad-x.com> <3EA97106.10807@foser.dyn.warande.net> In-Reply-To: <3EA97106.10807@foser.dyn.warande.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuilds not getting in :( X-Archives-Salt: 8498998a-908c-4563-9275-85858aff48b4 X-Archives-Hash: 9e5bcbf8aa0d8ae63f8ec8a382d0cffc foser wrote: > Apache-2.* is slotted and afaik stable enough to be used, so it doesn't > need to be masked (it can be ~ ofcourse). Squid 2.5 is considered the > current stable version. By the sound of what Dan is saying, they are > correct in the tree. Oops, you're right about squid. About apache though, 2.0.45 is presented as the latest available version in portage when using the ~x86 keyword, whereas 1.3.27 is present when one uses the x86 keyword. Is this a coincidence, in that 2.x will be marked stable at some point and all keywords will report it as the latest available version, in the same way apache.org recommends? Brad -- // -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ -- // -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list