From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27621 invoked by uid 1002); 21 Apr 2003 17:15:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 6178 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2003 17:15:54 -0000 Message-ID: <3EA42745.6020704@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:15:49 -0700 From: Zach Welch Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Boman CC: Gentoo Development List References: <20030418183124.F20567@securecirt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild request X-Archives-Salt: dca7e8de-cc27-4d5c-b724-96ee9a478f27 X-Archives-Hash: eec5856f93774b80c1fd147dd9bc9e99 Michael Boman wrote: > On some host I don't want to have GCC installed, but too many applications > are depending on libstdc++.so. Is there any work in place to create > a ebuild for the library only? A quick 'emerge -s libstdc++' yeilded > nothing. > For those unaware, those files are part of the gcc C++ runtime, and presently are created as part of the gcc ebuilds (qpkg -f gcc). I agree there is need to provide this separation, particularly to meet the requirements of embedded and handheld devices. However, I am unaware of a move to do so at this time. As I've gotten pretty heavily involved with the toolchain ebuilds lately, I'll take a look at what this will take it. You might search through bugs.gentoo.org for outstanding requests for this and, if you don't find any, feel free to post one and assign it to me. Zach Welch Gentoo Embedded Lead Superlucidity Services -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list