From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12860 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Apr 2003 15:22:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21356 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2003 15:22:20 -0000 Message-ID: <3E9AD163.308@home.se> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:18:59 +0800 From: Daniel Armyr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030401 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.71.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [gentoo-dev] Kernel compiling respecting CFLAGS X-Archives-Salt: 4575c7f2-528c-4202-8dd9-61c99aac9706 X-Archives-Hash: 01f4304c52b0da5d41c1030b11153971 After quite a few compiles, It seems to me that the compilation of kernels does not respect CFPAGS or CXXFLAGS settings. Is this true? If so, is there a reason besides "If people compile the kernel with the optimizations they want, their kernel will be mangled into oblivion."? //Daniel Armyr -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list