From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5068 invoked by uid 1002); 10 Apr 2003 15:18:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 6690 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 15:18:10 -0000 Message-ID: <3E9679E0.8040905@caddr.com> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 01:16:32 -0700 From: Miles Egan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Spider Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200304100013.30307.gentoo@mchsi.com> <20030410092759.14d8e24c.spider@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030410092759.14d8e24c.spider@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary release of gentoo X-Archives-Salt: bcf1990b-3433-434b-b3f6-e32185279fc2 X-Archives-Hash: 46d73454062d68a72026371b80c750c9 Spider wrote: > I know I'd welcome it, as a far simpler way of installing and keeping my > celeron running.. But I think it'd require some more portage hacking > to "make it work", at least the following. I help manage a linux compute cluster of about 1500 nodes. We run Redhat. Gentoo isn't even an option without something like kickstart and binary package support as good as rpm's. miles -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list