From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13648 invoked by uid 1002); 20 Feb 2003 16:45:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 22645 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2003 16:45:40 -0000 Message-ID: <3E5503E6.3030608@komcept.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:35:50 +0000 From: MAL Organization: Komcept Solutions Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Martin, Stephen" CC: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <0965EC92EF999641B60A596DF3A331DF0145DC96@wfmail01.intranet.veridian.com> In-Reply-To: <0965EC92EF999641B60A596DF3A331DF0145DC96@wfmail01.intranet.veridian.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.71.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing X-Archives-Salt: aafa3582-909f-4328-bc15-626cb8ebfa65 X-Archives-Hash: 2774cd763d1ca0f24dcee85789ea1391 Martin, Stephen wrote: > Is 2.0.47-r2 *supposed* to be in stable? I did an emerge -u world today and > it upgraded portage to 47. I too am now having all kinds of problems with > gcc-config. > Supposedly yes :/ I'm sticking with 2.0.46 until someone states what the cause is. Is, or was, your system, gentoo 1.2 ? MAL -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list