From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30262 invoked by uid 1002); 20 Feb 2003 10:29:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 11 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2003 10:29:57 -0000 Message-ID: <3E54ABDA.4070805@komcept.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:20:10 +0000 From: MAL Organization: Komcept Solutions Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Andresen CC: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20030216094614.B27729@twobit.net> <3E535F7B.2050406@komcept.com> <1045713598.21001.1.camel@ndiin> In-Reply-To: <1045713598.21001.1.camel@ndiin> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.71.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing X-Archives-Salt: 5d74fda9-86f7-4257-9a81-4e4b160bcdb1 X-Archives-Hash: 52f0a78327734401af43f44561147faa Eric Andresen wrote: > On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 19:56, Terje Kvernes wrote: > I'm willing to bet that the problem is caused by that particular > ebuild's changing of the PATH. Just a thought. ;) I don't see how.. I have a few (>3) 1.4 systems that went through the upgrade fine, and looking at them, I can't see any difference in the PATH settings, between them and my updated-1.2 system. MAL -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list