From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23430 invoked by uid 1002); 20 Feb 2003 10:27:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 24447 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2003 10:27:46 -0000 Message-ID: <3E54AB56.3030605@komcept.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:17:58 +0000 From: MAL Organization: Komcept Solutions Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Terje Kvernes CC: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20030216094614.B27729@twobit.net> <3E535F7B.2050406@komcept.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.71.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing X-Archives-Salt: 1da2ec77-b908-4c47-8ee1-5a5e28b1fc8b X-Archives-Hash: 46b35831828c7876f4b1f7568f667330 Terje Kvernes wrote: > the same thing happens here. reverting to portage 2.0.46-whatever > fixed the problem. this also made forkbombs on my box, since even > restarting X uses the GCC preprocessor, which didn't quite do it's > thing. this is, for the record, a 1.2-based system. I'll submit to > bugzilla eventually, when it's not 4am. :-) For the record, i'm on a was-1.2 system that I upgraded to 1.4 with the update scripts and info here: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/upgrade-to-gentoo-1.4.xml A good chunk of my system is probably still linked against the old libraries, as I emerged the compat libs instead of doing an emerge -e world. > and yes, I've included MAL explicitly in the To:-header. I'm touched. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list