From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30193 invoked by uid 1002); 10 Jan 2003 15:59:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 31185 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2003 15:59:03 -0000 Message-ID: <3E1EEDA6.6080801@foser.warande.net> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:58:30 +0100 From: foser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030107 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <1042134157.29339.21.camel@hogye-lx.metsci.com> <200301100002.55316.Jan.Winh uysen@TU-Clausthal.de> <87bs2pub5h.fsf@gentoo.shacknet.nu> <3E1E1E67.7060003 @foser.warande.net> <87lm1tqu47.fsf@gentoo.shacknet.nu> <3E1EC99B.1020509@foser.warande.net> <1042206318.27594.9.camel@hogye-lx.metsci.com> In-Reply-To: <1042206318.27594.9.camel@hogye-lx.metsci.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.71.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse X-Archives-Salt: b6e65cf8-fe65-44ea-9065-323ff9f555fa X-Archives-Hash: 2441525832ebdb27d8253981906fecf8 Mike Hogye wrote: > He probably means gtk+. That would allow 2.0.9 and 2.2.0 to coexist > peacefully -- eclipse could use 2.0.9, and everything else could use > 2.2.0. gtk+-2.0.9 and 2.2.0 cannot coexist like 1.2 and 2 can. > 2.2.0 is supposed to have maintained binary compatibility with 2.0. I'm > not sure how slotting decisions are made, but to me this looks more like > a bug that needs to be fixed. But where's the bug? In Sun's jre? In > gtk+? Most likely in eclipse, the progressbar thats talked about is not basic gtk. - foser -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list