public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bengt Gorden <bengan@sunet.se>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: etc-update & ._cfg* files: major issue with gentoo?
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 14:02:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E197E62.3000808@sunet.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 841y3qloyq.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de

Kai Großjohann wrote:
>
> But even in the cfengine case, it would be useful to stash the
> original versions of config files somewhere such that a diff between
> A and C could be requested.
> 
> What do people think?

I maintain a RCS-repository for all the changed files in /etc. It works 
well for me. I don't think (althogh I'm not familiar with the internals 
of etc-update) that it should be that big a problem to script rcs to 
just check in the new file. If it breaks its no problem reverting the 
file. And you have the benefit of being able to make diffs between A and 
C, as mentioned before.

/Bengan





--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-01-06 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-06  1:41 [gentoo-dev] etc-update & ._cfg* files: major issue with gentoo? Dhruba Bandopadhyay
2003-01-06  2:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Jackson
2003-01-06  5:24   ` Viktor Lakics
2003-01-06  6:03     ` Brian Jackson
2003-01-06 10:49     ` Jeremy Wohl
2003-01-06  6:40   ` Joseph Carter
2003-01-06  7:25 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-01-06 10:26   ` Toby Dickenson
2003-01-06 13:15     ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2003-01-06 13:02   ` Bengt Gorden [this message]
2003-01-10 11:10     ` Kai Großjohann
2003-01-10 15:25       ` Brian Hall
2003-01-10 15:33         ` Oliver Rutherfurd
2003-01-06 15:20   ` Joseph Carter
2003-01-06  7:37 ` [gentoo-dev] " Sven Vermeulen
     [not found] ` <200301060054.29991.absinthe@pobox.com>
2003-01-10 22:38   ` [gentoo-dev] " Kai Großjohann
2003-01-10 23:05     ` William Kenworthy
2003-01-11  1:48       ` Joseph Carter
2003-01-11 10:14       ` Kai Großjohann
2003-01-11 15:19         ` [gentoo-dev] Diff alternatives for etc-update (WAS: etc-update & ._cfg* files: major issue with gentoo?) Dylan Carlson
     [not found]           ` <84hecfmmpb.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
2003-01-11 21:29             ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff alternatives for etc-update Dylan Carlson
2003-01-11 21:44               ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-01-11 23:59                 ` Dylan Carlson
2003-01-13 22:39           ` [gentoo-dev] Diff alternatives for etc-update (WAS: etc-update & ._cfg* files: major issue with gentoo?) Peter Ruskin
2003-01-13 22:50             ` Dylan Carlson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E197E62.3000808@sunet.se \
    --to=bengan@sunet.se \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox