From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32717 invoked by uid 1002); 17 Dec 2002 13:15:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 5410 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2002 13:15:13 -0000 Message-ID: <3DFF30C3.6080106@foser.warande.net> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:12:19 +0100 From: foser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <3DFE1BD9.5090004@foser.warande.net> <20021216203412.GB8276@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> <3DFE7864.9060903@foser.warande.net> <20021217102535.GB3468@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> In-Reply-To: <20021217102535.GB3468@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.71.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? X-Archives-Salt: 37fef405-b34c-4158-b0ce-057c329108ef X-Archives-Hash: 8d641a1d89e667728ddf5316505500ec Maik Schreiber wrote: >>And i'm not sure it's a good idea to stabilize top packages while some >>of it's -needed- deps are still masked testing, i mean this will break >>things like -u world won't it ? > > > Yes, but this is a problem in Portage (emerge). It really shouldn't break. So, we're talking features not in portage yet. As it is imho it is better to mask top packages with masked deps. - foser -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list