From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_REJECT,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [192.108.102.143]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E865EAC472 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 14:26:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from myrealbox.com k8la@smtp-send.myrealbox.com [209.164.228.171] by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.14 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:26:15 -0600 Message-ID: <3DBC4BAF.2020304@myrealbox.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:25:19 -0500 From: "Thomas M. Beaudry" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020731 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: When is Gentoo 1.4 going to be released? References: <001a01c27ab0$2ac3c120$8204dca7@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 8b83d846-8333-4db4-bee8-1a04038f4f64 X-Archives-Hash: f941a94452a1d9df9502fd8488bd7421 You did and so did others. He's trying to turn a mess created by Daniel's fair-haired boys' lack of communication into a bigger mess. The short version: he's a troll. Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > Nobody suggested tossing "software over the fence". I thought I had made > myself pretty clear on that.. > > Tom Veldhouse > > > >>"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote: >> >>>People are looking for a general idea of a release schedule. I can not >>>blame them for asking and I can not blame them for being frustrated when >>>they don't get an answer, even if it is a ballpark figure. >> > > "3.2.3" wrote: > i can blame them. enough software in this world is tossed over the fence > according to a schedule. i don't need any more software that was > developed to a schedule. i've got enought of that at work. i need > software that is actually ready when it is ready, whenever that is. i'm > glad there is some. eye on the ball, not somebody's stopwatch. > > regards, > > chris calloway > -- Thomas M. Beaudry k8la / ys1ztm