[gentoo-dev] mozilla-1.0-r3

[gentoo-dev] mozilla-1.0-r3

[MAL]

Can anyone tell me why 'emerge -p -u world' wants to /upgrade/ mozilla-1.0-r3 to mozilla-1.0-r2 ?

Cheers,

MAL

Re: [gentoo-dev] mozilla-1.0-r3

[Brandon Low]

1.0-r3 was causing problems for a lot of people so it has been masked out, 
if it works OK for you don't go back to -r2, however we felt it was safest 
to move the majority of users back due to some install problems.

--Brandon

On Wed, 07/10/02 at 14:25:56 +0100, MAL wrote:
> Can anyone tell me why 'emerge -p -u world' wants to /upgrade/ mozilla-1.0-r3 to mozilla-1.0-r2 ?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> MAL
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

[gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[MAL]

Thanks... but do you know how I can flag an 'update' to not update when I do "emerge -u world" ?

Cos U don't want to manually work around mozilla until it's updated again.

Regards,

MAL


Brandon Low wrote:
> 1.0-r3 was causing problems for a lot of people so it has been masked out, 
> if it works OK for you don't go back to -r2, however we felt it was safest 
> to move the majority of users back due to some install problems.
> 
> --Brandon
> 
> On Wed, 07/10/02 at 14:25:56 +0100, MAL wrote:
> 
>>Can anyone tell me why 'emerge -p -u world' wants to /upgrade/ mozilla-1.0-r3 to mozilla-1.0-r2 ?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>MAL
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>gentoo-dev mailing list
>>gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
>>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[David Olsen]

Remove it from /var/cache/edb/world.

Best Regards, 

David Olsen
Administrator
linuxpimpz.com
AIM: DavidJ911
"Geek -- once it was a four-letter insult, now it's a six-figure salary."

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:41:21PM +0100, MAL wrote:
> Thanks... but do you know how I can flag an 'update' to not update when I 
> do "emerge -u world" ?
> 
> Cos U don't want to manually work around mozilla until it's updated again.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> MAL
> 
> 
> Brandon Low wrote:
> >1.0-r3 was causing problems for a lot of people so it has been masked out, 
> >if it works OK for you don't go back to -r2, however we felt it was safest 
> >to move the majority of users back due to some install problems.
> >
> >--Brandon
> >
> >On Wed, 07/10/02 at 14:25:56 +0100, MAL wrote:
> >
> >>Can anyone tell me why 'emerge -p -u world' wants to /upgrade/ 
> >>mozilla-1.0-r3 to mozilla-1.0-r2 ?
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>
> >>MAL
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>gentoo-dev mailing list
> >>gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> >>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >gentoo-dev mailing list
> >gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> >http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[Brandon Low]

Or you could remove mozilla-1.0-r3 from /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask 
which would tell portage that you want to keep using that version and not 
to change.

--Brandon

On Wed, 07/10/02 at 14:41:21 +0100, MAL wrote:
> Thanks... but do you know how I can flag an 'update' to not update when I do "emerge -u world" ?
> 
> Cos U don't want to manually work around mozilla until it's updated again.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> MAL
> 
> 
> Brandon Low wrote:
> > 1.0-r3 was causing problems for a lot of people so it has been masked out, 
> > if it works OK for you don't go back to -r2, however we felt it was safest 
> > to move the majority of users back due to some install problems.
> > 
> > --Brandon
> > 
> > On Wed, 07/10/02 at 14:25:56 +0100, MAL wrote:
> > 
> >>Can anyone tell me why 'emerge -p -u world' wants to /upgrade/ mozilla-1.0-r3 to mozilla-1.0-r2 ?
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>
> >>MAL
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>gentoo-dev mailing list
> >>gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> >>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gentoo-dev mailing list
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

[gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[MAL]

David Olsen wrote:
 > Remove it from /var/cache/edb/world.

Brandon Low wrote:
 > Or you could remove mozilla-1.0-r3 from /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask
 > which would tell portage that you want to keep using that version and not
 > to change.

Doesn't package.mask get replaced on each "emerge --clean rsync" ?
And wouldn't removing mozilla from /var/cache/edb/world mean that I won't get any /future/ updates, (ie. -r4)

Please, tell me if i'm wrong.

These seem to be get-arounds rather than designed solutions. Surely there's a way to flag that you don't want a particular update, recorded on your own pc, not in an every-changing portage tree.  A local package mask file?

Thanks for the info tho ppl,

MAL

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[Hannes Mehnert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 04:35:59PM +0100, MAL wrote:
> These seem to be get-arounds rather than designed solutions. Surely 
> there's a way to flag that you don't want a particular update, recorded 
> on your own pc, not in an every-changing portage tree.  A local package 
> mask file?

Just inject the ebuild.

Hannes Mehnert

GPG-Fingerprint: B3BB E539 F6BF 6942 1492  3ACF 45CB 8D97 3881 8D1C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9LFWYRcuNlziBjRwRAnskAJ4ghOnbclpjF1y15EEWYE9I+Xn78QCdHme3
0ak56tN56PtpAhwl7/rNKtw=
=mg+C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[MAL]

Hannes Mehnert wrote:
 > Just inject the ebuild.

Perfect, looks like gentoo users need to be better educated on the portage system ;)

Thanks all,

MAL

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[Paul de Vrieze]

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 17:47, MAL wrote:
> Hannes Mehnert wrote:
>  > Just inject the ebuild.
>
> Perfect, looks like gentoo users need to be better educated on the portage
> system ;)
>
> Thanks all,
>

Does anyone know whether it is possible to "copy" / "rename" a package's data 
such as to pretend an older version is a newer version but disturb the system 
less than with a fake ebuild. (Or am I mistaken about inject?)

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Junior Researcher
Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

[gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[MAL]

Hannes Mehnert wrote:
  > Just inject the ebuild.

!!! Not injecting net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2; Package already exists.

Is the only way I can do this to edit the package mask.... every time I "emerge --clean rsync" ?

Regards,

MAL

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[Hannes Mehnert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:49:29PM +0100, MAL wrote:
> !!! Not injecting net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2; Package already exists.

You emerged net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2?
Try to unmerge this (because You have merged -r3), then inject the
net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2.

Try also pkg-clean.

I don't know why this thread is discussed on gentoo-dev, it would
fit gentoo-user better, imho.

Hannes Mehnert

GPG-Fingerprint: B3BB E539 F6BF 6942 1492  3ACF 45CB 8D97 3881 8D1C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9LGsFRcuNlziBjRwRAmPSAJwOhKmplNv+BSFSfre1TGYd/pKiUACfeV+I
OT0UaPfajaS/EHos3sspM1k=
=IZDf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[MAL]

Hannes Megnert wrote:
> You emerged net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2?
> Try to unmerge this (because You have merged -r3), then inject the
> net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2.

mozilla-1.0-r2 was unmerged when mozilla-1.0-r3 was emerged. I made sure.

Turns out, if you do: emerge inject mozilla-1.0-r2, it bitches that it's already installed, but if you do: emerge inject net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2, it injects fine. bug?

> 
> Try also pkg-clean.
> 

Doesn't exist on my Gentoo system, it part of the addon package tools?

> I don't know why this thread is discussed on gentoo-dev, it would
> fit gentoo-user better, imho.

I was questioning the competency of portage.

> 
> Hannes Mehnert
> 

Cheers,
MAL

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[Nick Jones]

> Hannes Megnert wrote:
> > You emerged net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2?
> > Try to unmerge this (because You have merged -r3), then inject the
> > net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2.
> 
> mozilla-1.0-r2 was unmerged when mozilla-1.0-r3 was emerged. I made sure.
> 
> Turns out, if you do: emerge inject mozilla-1.0-r2, it bitches that
> it's already installed, but if you do:
> emerge inject net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2, it injects fine. bug?

Required syntax. Not a bug.

> > 
> > Try also pkg-clean.
> > 
> 
> Doesn't exist on my Gentoo system, it part of the addon package tools?

It was a support script. I believe it has been deprecated and removed.
But would exist in: /usr/lib/portage/bin/

[gentoo-dev] Re: mozilla-1.0-r3

[MAL]

Nick Jones wrote:
>>Turns out, if you do: emerge inject mozilla-1.0-r2, it bitches that
>>it's already installed, but if you do:
>>emerge inject net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2, it injects fine. bug?
> 
> Required syntax. Not a bug.

If it says that mozilla-1.0-r2 is installed when it's not, regardless of the syntax, it's a bug is it not?

MAL