public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Miguel S. Filipe" <m3thos@netcabo.pt>
To: Collins <erichey2@attbi.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo & fhs
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 17:06:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D207E03.4000402@netcabo.pt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020701173735.5d1093ae.erichey2@attbi.com

Collins wrote:

>Just finished a lengthy interchange wih a "gentleman" (loosely
>speaking) on another group this weekend.  Said gentleman considers
>himself to be a chief priest of the fhs religion, and he says that he
>wouldn't touch gentoo with a fork because gnome and kde are in the
>/usr hierarchy instead of the /opt hierarchy "where god intended them
>to be."
>
>Just curious, is he all wet, or is this a conscious departure from the
>fhs requirements?
>
>  
>
I do touch gentoo, but I also would like if gentoo would put those "mega 
apps" (kde and gnome)
in the /opt, I don't know if there is any rule* about this, I just like 
them better in /opt..


Something that might be related to this is the question:
Does gentoo folows the linux standart base? url: http://www.linuxbase.org

*: after looking in google it seems that there exists a supposed standart
File Hierarchy Standart url: http://www.pathname.com/fhs

What do developers and Drobbins think of this, {should,are,must} any of 
this standarts be followed?

Miguel Sousa Filipe
gentoo user in .pt (PORTUGAL)
handle: m3thos
more human than human




  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-02  1:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-01 23:37 [gentoo-dev] gentoo & fhs Collins
2002-07-01 16:06 ` Miguel S. Filipe [this message]
2002-07-02  0:50 ` Spider
     [not found]   ` <20020701190627.28c32c2e.erichey2@attbi.com>
2002-07-02  1:47     ` Spider
2002-07-02  2:38       ` Collins
2002-07-02 12:02         ` Alexander Gretencord
2002-07-02 15:12           ` Karl Trygve Kalleberg
2002-07-02 12:53         ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Goodyear
2001-12-08 13:21           ` Maciek Borowka
2002-07-02 15:55           ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-07-02 17:00           ` Bart Verwilst
2002-07-02 18:41         ` [gentoo-dev] Why the FHS can't be followed Dan Armak
2002-07-02 19:10           ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-07-02 20:06             ` Luke Ravitch
2002-07-02 22:00               ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-07-03  1:54                 ` Luke Ravitch
2002-07-03  3:08                   ` Fuper
2002-07-05 16:33                     ` [gentoo-dev] Stow (Was: Why the FHS can't be followed) Wout Mertens
2002-07-05 16:59                       ` Brian Webb
2002-07-05 22:39                         ` Fuper
2002-07-05 17:14                       ` Alexander Gretencord
2002-07-02 22:18               ` [gentoo-dev] Why the FHS can't be followed Fuper
2002-07-03  2:05                 ` Luke Ravitch
2002-07-03  1:10               ` Peter Ruskin
2002-07-02 20:55           ` Terje Kvernes
2002-07-02 15:09 ` [gentoo-dev] gentoo & fhs Karl Trygve Kalleberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D207E03.4000402@netcabo.pt \
    --to=m3thos@netcabo.pt \
    --cc=erichey2@attbi.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox