From: "Miguel S. Filipe" <m3thos@netcabo.pt>
To: Collins <erichey2@attbi.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo & fhs
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 17:06:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D207E03.4000402@netcabo.pt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020701173735.5d1093ae.erichey2@attbi.com
Collins wrote:
>Just finished a lengthy interchange wih a "gentleman" (loosely
>speaking) on another group this weekend. Said gentleman considers
>himself to be a chief priest of the fhs religion, and he says that he
>wouldn't touch gentoo with a fork because gnome and kde are in the
>/usr hierarchy instead of the /opt hierarchy "where god intended them
>to be."
>
>Just curious, is he all wet, or is this a conscious departure from the
>fhs requirements?
>
>
>
I do touch gentoo, but I also would like if gentoo would put those "mega
apps" (kde and gnome)
in the /opt, I don't know if there is any rule* about this, I just like
them better in /opt..
Something that might be related to this is the question:
Does gentoo folows the linux standart base? url: http://www.linuxbase.org
*: after looking in google it seems that there exists a supposed standart
File Hierarchy Standart url: http://www.pathname.com/fhs
What do developers and Drobbins think of this, {should,are,must} any of
this standarts be followed?
Miguel Sousa Filipe
gentoo user in .pt (PORTUGAL)
handle: m3thos
more human than human
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-02 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-01 23:37 [gentoo-dev] gentoo & fhs Collins
2002-07-01 16:06 ` Miguel S. Filipe [this message]
2002-07-02 0:50 ` Spider
[not found] ` <20020701190627.28c32c2e.erichey2@attbi.com>
2002-07-02 1:47 ` Spider
2002-07-02 2:38 ` Collins
2002-07-02 12:02 ` Alexander Gretencord
2002-07-02 15:12 ` Karl Trygve Kalleberg
2002-07-02 12:53 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Goodyear
2001-12-08 13:21 ` Maciek Borowka
2002-07-02 15:55 ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-07-02 17:00 ` Bart Verwilst
2002-07-02 18:41 ` [gentoo-dev] Why the FHS can't be followed Dan Armak
2002-07-02 19:10 ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-07-02 20:06 ` Luke Ravitch
2002-07-02 22:00 ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-07-03 1:54 ` Luke Ravitch
2002-07-03 3:08 ` Fuper
2002-07-05 16:33 ` [gentoo-dev] Stow (Was: Why the FHS can't be followed) Wout Mertens
2002-07-05 16:59 ` Brian Webb
2002-07-05 22:39 ` Fuper
2002-07-05 17:14 ` Alexander Gretencord
2002-07-02 22:18 ` [gentoo-dev] Why the FHS can't be followed Fuper
2002-07-03 2:05 ` Luke Ravitch
2002-07-03 1:10 ` Peter Ruskin
2002-07-02 20:55 ` Terje Kvernes
2002-07-02 15:09 ` [gentoo-dev] gentoo & fhs Karl Trygve Kalleberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D207E03.4000402@netcabo.pt \
--to=m3thos@netcabo.pt \
--cc=erichey2@attbi.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox