public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Naumov <jago@telefragged.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Proposition for stage3.
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:52:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D0F573D.3010306@telefragged.com> (raw)

Hello.

I just thought I'd share an idea I had about stage3. I think it would be 
nice if it was usable for systems older then i686 and if it used -O1 or 
-O2 instead of -O3. The reasons are simple:

The majority of the people who actually want to use stage3 do so because 
of the time it takes to build the ENTIRE system from scratch. This 
mainly applies to old PC's, which are obviously older then i686. I've 
seen quite a few people on #gentoo complain that it is a major pain in 
the ass to install Gentoo on an old system.

As for -O1 / -O2 instead of the default -O3, it's just that some people 
want to be "safe". I've had all kinds of weirnesses and unexplainable 
crashes due to software compiled with -O3 and no other optimisations. 
These problems always went away after a recompile with -O2. And I am 
pretty sure I am not the only one who thinks that way, because many 
people I know got "burned" when utilising heavy opts.

Sincerely,
-- 


#-------------------------------------------------------#
|  Dan Naumov (aka Jago on IRC) || Otavantie 2, 50670,  |
|     Otava Folk Highschool     ||   Otava, Finland.    |
#-------------------------------------------------------#
|      User of Gentoo Linux : http://www.gentoo.org     |
#-------------------------------------------------------#



             reply	other threads:[~2002-06-18 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-18 15:52 Dan Naumov [this message]
2002-06-18 16:22 ` [gentoo-dev] Proposition for stage3 Bart Verwilst
2002-06-18 16:41   ` Per Wigren
2002-06-18 18:48     ` Rufiao
2002-06-18 19:27       ` Per Wigren
2002-06-18 20:13       ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla
2002-06-18 21:38       ` Spider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D0F573D.3010306@telefragged.com \
    --to=jago@telefragged.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox