From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <marko@seul.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,
	DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=4.0.0
Received: from obelix.spectraweb.ch (obelix.plusnet.ch [194.158.230.8])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02989ABD50
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sun,  9 Jun 2002 08:34:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from seul.org (adsl-p42-dialup-89.adslplus.ch [195.141.144.89])
	by obelix.spectraweb.ch (8.11.2/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id g59DXw015064
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 15:33:58 +0200
Message-ID: <3D03ACFC.5040303@seul.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 15:31:08 -0400
From: Marko Mikulicic <marko@seul.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Contribute many ebuilds at once
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020609021600.11015B-100000@pluto.prosalg.no> <3D02F8A8.7030108@seul.org> <200206091256.52748.pauldv@cs.kun.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 13403b6d-da4a-4baa-91a4-9281e630f9f8
X-Archives-Hash: 9cf2b3d95e6b61f26e69e958d395e654

Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Sunday 09 June 2002 08:41, Marko Mikulicic wrote:
> 
>>  Alternatively I could write a dummy client which connects to the
>>bugzilla like a webbrowser and automates the submission.
>>  (I suppose there is not a secure straight connection to the bugzilla
>>backend)
>>
> 
> The problem is not so much the submission itself, but what happens afterwards. 
> New ebuilds take a lot of time to be included in the tree (if you have bad 
> luck)
> 
> The new system tries to resolve that.

are you talking about portage2 ?