From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <marko@seul.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from stsws5.die.supsi.ch (stsws5.die.supsi.ch [193.5.154.5]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F0EABDB3 for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 07:42:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from seul.org (pcm4036.die.supsi.ch [193.5.154.36]) by stsws5.die.supsi.ch (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA09789 for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 14:42:45 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3CFCB5C4.3060109@seul.org> Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 14:42:44 +0200 From: Marko Mikulicic <marko@seul.org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] doinst recursive? References: <3CFCAD43.1020300@seul.org> <20020604152159.3fb59962.jago@telefragged.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>, <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe> List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>, <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/> X-Archives-Salt: aa608840-bcbf-42de-be6a-a6344f5e02d1 X-Archives-Hash: ada93f49cdfe4d6acc5a8ed42347b0a8 Dan Naumov wrote: > There is no real difference between an updated 1.1a system and a 1.2 system. Also, this problem with acroread is a known bug. Do a search for it on Gentoo Bugzilla. Thank you. I cannot find the bug report. However I wish to know one thing: "doins" will install its arguments. can it do it recursively, with some switch. Where can I find the sources of the "doins" function ? thanks, Marko