public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chad M. Huneycutt" <chad.huneycutt@acm.org>
To: gentoo-user@gentoo.org, gentoo-newbie@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Reply-To Munging
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 12:31:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CEFBC4C.5060009@acm.org> (raw)

It looks like the decision on whether or not to stop reply-to munging has 
fallen to me.  After a little debate, I have decided to leave the mailing 
lists as they are.

First, I would ask that everyone read the excellent articles at the 
following URLs:

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml

They pretty well cover the pros & cons of reply-to munging.  I find the 
latter article much more compelling, but maybe that is b/c I like the 
system how it is already.  I would like to add one more point. I personally 
do not use the "group reply" function on MUA's unless I really need to.  I 
don't want to even risk getting into the habit of hitting that and 
accidentally mass-mailing a personal mail.  You might notice that this is 
very similar to an argument made in the first article above.  My response 
is that it is very unlikely that I will be mailing information of a 
personal nature in response to a mailing list posting.

For those that want people to use a different address than their From: 
address, I suggest you put it in your signature.

Feel free to respond to this, and if I feel that an overwhelming number of 
you really would prefer to do away with Reply-to munging, then I will do it.

One other thing that I will consider.  If a particular mailing list feels 
that reply-to munging is not necessarily, we could remove it just for that 
group.


Chad Huneycutt (chadh@gentoo.org)



             reply	other threads:[~2002-05-25 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-25 16:31 Chad M. Huneycutt [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-14  8:54 [gentoo-dev] reply-to munging Paul de Vrieze
2005-04-14  9:01 ` Andrea Barisani
2005-04-14  9:06   ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-04-14  9:11     ` Andrea Barisani
2005-04-14 11:18       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-04-14 13:49         ` Ming Zhao
2005-04-14 14:15           ` Stuart Longland
2005-04-14 15:23             ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-04-14 15:42               ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-04-14 18:59                 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-04-14 16:32               ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-04-14 17:25                 ` Drake Wyrm
2005-04-14 18:11                 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-04-14 19:01                   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-04-15  6:35                 ` Andrea Barisani
2005-04-15 19:52                   ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-04-16  8:59                     ` Andrea Barisani
2005-04-16  9:09                       ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-04-14 20:10               ` Jason Wever
2005-04-15  0:37                 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-04-17 18:02                 ` D. Wokan
2005-04-14 23:20               ` Stuart Longland
2005-04-15 11:32                 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-04-14 12:12       ` Graham Murray
2005-04-14 12:40       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-04-14  9:16     ` Spider
2005-04-14  9:11   ` Paul de Vrieze
2001-01-08  5:26 drobbins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CEFBC4C.5060009@acm.org \
    --to=chad.huneycutt@acm.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-newbie@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox