From: "Chad M. Huneycutt" <chad.huneycutt@acm.org>
To: gentoo-user@gentoo.org, gentoo-newbie@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Reply-To Munging
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 12:31:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CEFBC4C.5060009@acm.org> (raw)
It looks like the decision on whether or not to stop reply-to munging has
fallen to me. After a little debate, I have decided to leave the mailing
lists as they are.
First, I would ask that everyone read the excellent articles at the
following URLs:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
They pretty well cover the pros & cons of reply-to munging. I find the
latter article much more compelling, but maybe that is b/c I like the
system how it is already. I would like to add one more point. I personally
do not use the "group reply" function on MUA's unless I really need to. I
don't want to even risk getting into the habit of hitting that and
accidentally mass-mailing a personal mail. You might notice that this is
very similar to an argument made in the first article above. My response
is that it is very unlikely that I will be mailing information of a
personal nature in response to a mailing list posting.
For those that want people to use a different address than their From:
address, I suggest you put it in your signature.
Feel free to respond to this, and if I feel that an overwhelming number of
you really would prefer to do away with Reply-to munging, then I will do it.
One other thing that I will consider. If a particular mailing list feels
that reply-to munging is not necessarily, we could remove it just for that
group.
Chad Huneycutt (chadh@gentoo.org)
next reply other threads:[~2002-05-25 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-25 16:31 Chad M. Huneycutt [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-14 8:54 [gentoo-dev] reply-to munging Paul de Vrieze
2005-04-14 9:01 ` Andrea Barisani
2005-04-14 9:06 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-04-14 9:11 ` Andrea Barisani
2005-04-14 11:18 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-04-14 13:49 ` Ming Zhao
2005-04-14 14:15 ` Stuart Longland
2005-04-14 15:23 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-04-14 15:42 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-04-14 18:59 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-04-14 16:32 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-04-14 17:25 ` Drake Wyrm
2005-04-14 18:11 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-04-14 19:01 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-04-15 6:35 ` Andrea Barisani
2005-04-15 19:52 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-04-16 8:59 ` Andrea Barisani
2005-04-16 9:09 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-04-14 20:10 ` Jason Wever
2005-04-15 0:37 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-04-17 18:02 ` D. Wokan
2005-04-14 23:20 ` Stuart Longland
2005-04-15 11:32 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-04-14 12:12 ` Graham Murray
2005-04-14 12:40 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-04-14 9:16 ` Spider
2005-04-14 9:11 ` Paul de Vrieze
2001-01-08 5:26 drobbins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CEFBC4C.5060009@acm.org \
--to=chad.huneycutt@acm.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-newbie@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox