From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_REJECT, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from goliath.dnshome.org (c-24-98-65-184.atl.client2.attbi.com [24.98.65.184]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C06ABD8D for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 08:34:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from acm.org (unknown [192.168.1.178]) by goliath.dnshome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D3912AFB6 for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:34:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CE3B568.40603@acm.org> Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 09:34:32 -0400 From: "Chad M. Huneycutt" Organization: Georgia Tech College of Computing User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] src_unpack and patches References: <20020516144731.1ad6ed3e.ryan.shaw@stanfordalumni.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Reply-To: chadh@cc.gatech.edu List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: ac6e8052-2d8e-4de0-a352-99dff862391d X-Archives-Hash: 31e6e055363fdf3ec50c232d1bdd4caf Ryan Shaw wrote: > Hello, > > The developer docs say: > > src_unpack: Use this function to unpack your sources and apply > patches, and run autoconf/automake/etc. if necessary. By default, > unpacks the packages in ${A} and applies ${PF}-gentoo.diff. The > default starting directory is ${WORKDIR}. > > However, src_unpack just seems to unpack sources: it doesn't > apply the *-gentoo.diff patch automatically. Are the docs old > or is this something intended that hasn't been implemented > yet? I am not sure whether it used to patch and now doesn't or if the patching was just never implemented by default. At any rate, you should report this at bugzilla. You might also mention that the unpack routine is a little braindead with respect fo files that are gzipped, but not tarred. Chad (chadh@gentoo.org)