From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_REJECT,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from netscape.com (c3po.netscape.com [205.217.237.46]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B0C2019F3C for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:52:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from judge.mcom.com (judge.mcom.com [205.217.237.53]) by netscape.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id g3CJqqs16058 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netscape.com ([10.169.97.219]) by judge.mcom.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GUH0K702.T1S for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:52:55 -0700 Message-ID: <3CB73B04.5090803@netscape.com> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:52:36 -0700 From: antitux@netscape.com (John Dee) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9+) Gecko/20020321 Netscape6/6.2.1+ X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Netscape Packages References: <3CB7285B.2060004@netscape.com> <200204121205.15245.georges@its.caltech.edu> <3CB734BE.50707@netscape.com> <1018640435.5988.20.camel@seahorse> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 47288561-e76b-4d1a-a83e-5270c5426711 X-Archives-Hash: 27c93a82bcf4735eeead3df47af1fe1c I have no problems keeping it around, but renaming 4.x to either "netscape-communicator" or "netscape-navigator" for the actual executable binaries. You follow? By no means do I want to get rid of netscape 4.x (though I would like to see the project die a horrible death, the code is a mess, and it's older than hell.). I know it's one of the standards out there, but even netscape's customers are being pushed towards 6.x. Avi Schwartz wrote: > No, no, no. Netscape 4.X is still very usefull for accessing web sites > which will not work properly with Netscape 6.X or Mozilla. Some of the > banks still do not consider Netscape 6.X/Mozilla as safe enough and the > only way for me to do web banking is using Netscape 4.X. Citibank is > one such example. > > Avi > > On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 14:25, John Dee wrote: > >>One more question I've got. >>Would you guys be willing to replace netscape 4.x with netscape 6 as the >>default browser? >>Since netscape 4.x isn't really being maintained anymore (I do builds >>once a week, blah bleh), and the 6.x line is nscp's main focus, would >>you guys be willing to make netscape6 the default netscape browser? >