From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <jhhudso@volumehost.com> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from volumehost.com (volumehost.com [216.63.158.9]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD85B2019D5F for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 16:45:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from volumehost.com (albert.volumehost.com [10.0.0.2]) by volumehost.com (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id g36MjCP27795 for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 16:45:13 -0600 Message-ID: <3CAF7A2B.9030004@volumehost.com> Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 16:43:55 -0600 From: "Jared H. Hudson" <jhhudso@volumehost.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020313 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gcc 3.0.4 installed system References: <20020406101237.U26184-100000@shell.phattydomain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>, <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe> List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>, <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/> X-Archives-Salt: 1a2c6e10-72bc-4b58-923e-eefe62d239f0 X-Archives-Hash: 0f3d5aafc9801a10eff9b7dd27fc16dc And Pentium 4 optimizations. Joe Oppegaard wrote: > On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Bart Verwilst wrote: > > >>Hmm.. >> >>Great that gentoo is now gcc3.x compliant :o) >>But what are the advantages of using gcc 3.x over gcc 2.95.x? >>Isn't gcc 3.x slower than 2.95? > > > One of the advantages of gcc 3.x is that it has special optimizations for > Athlon processors. Other then that, I'm not too familiar with gcc 3.x. > > > >>Thanks, great work! >> >>On Saturday 06 April 2002 14:01, Geert Bevin wrote: >>|| Hi all, >>|| >>|| I finally installed 1.0 from scratch and decided to try it out with gcc >>|| 3.0.4 instead of 2.95.3. Along the way I encountered some problems, but >>|| surprisingly little. I've fixed everything that needed fixing and sadly >>|| some packages are backwards incompatible. For that reason and for the >>|| ease of maintenance I've created a dedicated gcc 3 profile. >>|| >>|| So, for those that want to try this out, just link the default-1.0-gcc3 >>|| profile instead of default-1.0 to /etc/make.profile. Note that this will >>|| only work for installations from scratch and not for updates since >>|| applications that link against libstdc++ v2 require the libraries of gcc >>|| v2 and not gcc v3. >>|| >>|| There are still some packages that don't compile such as galeon and >>|| openjade, but these will be fixed in a matter of time since I need them >>|| ;-) Feel free to submit fixes too. >>|| >>|| Best regards, >>|| >>|| Geert Bevin >> >>-- >>Bart Verwilst >>Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team >>Gent, Belgium >>_______________________________________________ >>gentoo-dev mailing list >>gentoo-dev@gentoo.org >>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev >> > > > -- > -Joe Oppegaard > http://joppegaard.com > > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev