public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zach Forrest <zach@disinformation.ca>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] portage revisited
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:44:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C9135DC.4010302@disinformation.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1016144825.2532.12.camel@fightclub.culthero.info

You can use pkg-clean from gentoolkit.

Joshua Hansen wrote:
> I have found that about the only time you need to leave a previous
> version on is if there is a large difference in the version number
> (assuming you do regular updates). I like keeping things clean so I go
> through and do my unmerges about once every week or two.
> 
> I'm thinking about writing a script (and the reason I bring this up is
> if it already exists, point me to it so i don't waste the time) that
> uses the qpkg --dups command and then lists and then asks if you want to
> remove certain packages. Maybe even include an option to kill all
> duplicates and just have a little file that contains things like
> FreeType and DB.
> 
> Is there something like that? And, if anyone were interested in
> including it with the scripts collection (like Gentools) what would be
> the preferred language to write it in?
> 
> Joshua
> 
> On Thu, 2002-03-14 at 14:10, Rogan wrote:
> 
>>emerge --unmerge work fine.  I am not sure if you neet to unmerge older versions of software, but from my experience, older versions are 'updated', ie. removed when you install a new version.  When in doubt, don't unmerge ;)
>>
>>Rogan
>>
>>On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:28:01 -0800
>>"Adam Ingram-Goble" <adam-aig@attbi.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>the documentation on portage at the site is dated Oct 21,  I'm wondering if
>>>any new features (such as emerge --unmerge) have been implemented.  also is
>>>it critical that you unmerge some old version of some software, or can it
>>>remain resident until you're sure its ok to get rid of?
>>>
>>>adam
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: gentoo-user-admin@gentoo.org
>>>[mailto:gentoo-user-admin@gentoo.org]On Behalf Of Glenn E Burns
>>>Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:51 PM
>>>To: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
>>>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage revisited
>>>
>>>
>>>chad:
>>>
>>>i tried both emerge rsync/sync and i still got errors.... i'm doing an
>>>emerge-webrsync right now and hopefully that will have the correct
>>>ebuild files.
>>>
>>>worse comes to worse, I still have the portage binaries from the last
>>>time this happened to me (_pre9)
>>>
>>>...ok emerge-webrsync worked ... emerging portage... presto!
>>>
>>>all is well...
>>>
>>>peace!
>>>
>>>-g
>>>
>>>Chad M. Huneycutt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Glenn E Burns wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>last night i did "emerge --world update", all seemed ok until i tried
>>>>>to do "emerge rsync" just a few moments ago... this is the error output:
>>>>>
>>>>># emerge rsync
>>>>>!!!  not recognized; exiting.
>>>>>
>>>>>Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>>>>[ebuild   R  ] sys-apps/portage-1.8.9_pre25 to /
>>>>>
>>>>>did portage-1.8.9_pre25 get unmasked and it wasn't supposed to be?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yep.  emerge rsync (also try emerge sync), and emerge portage, and you
>>>>should revert back to 1.8.8
>>>>
>>>>Sorry about that.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>gentoo-user mailing list
>>>gentoo-user@gentoo.org
>>>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-user
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>gentoo-user mailing list
>>>gentoo-user@gentoo.org
>>>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-user
>>>
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>gentoo-user mailing list
>>gentoo-user@gentoo.org
>>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-user
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-14 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3C910D3B.9010901@earthlink.net>
     [not found] ` <NDECLAINNBLNMIOCBPMPGEKLCDAA.adam-aig@attbi.com>
     [not found]   ` <20020314141051.69757313.rogan@fizbat.com>
2002-03-14 22:27     ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] portage revisited Joshua Hansen
2002-03-14 23:44       ` Zach Forrest [this message]
2002-03-15  3:17         ` Joshua Hansen
2002-03-15  8:44           ` Bjarke Sørensen
2002-03-15  9:56       ` Bob Phan
2002-03-15 18:20         ` Zach Forrest
2002-03-15 13:52           ` Bob Phan
2002-03-15 19:42             ` Zach Forrest
2002-03-15 19:08         ` Frank Thieme

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C9135DC.4010302@disinformation.ca \
    --to=zach@disinformation.ca \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox