From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yannick.koehler@colubris.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
	version=4.0.0
Received: from exchange.colubris.com (gate.colubris.com [206.162.167.230])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5222015DB2
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:36:25 -0600 (CST)
Received: from colubris.com ([192.168.30.147] RDNS failed) by exchange.colubris.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.3779);
	 Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:29:37 -0500
Message-ID: <3C8D3F66.3090109@colubris.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:36:06 -0500
From: Yannick Koehler <yannick.koehler@colubris.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020218
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] CUnit - !!! Name error in CUnit-1.0-4: multiple	version parts.
References: <3C8D26A2.6090505@colubris.com> 	<1015886000.610.12.camel@silica.localmosci> <1015886503.1921.15.camel@silica.localmosci>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2002 23:29:37.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[9C1DA970:01C1C954]
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 5a5b4dd7-4ee9-4090-b7d5-cab223c75c05
X-Archives-Hash: bddb00fcc3d20ed24c461851b4b840e0

Tod M. Neidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 16:33, Tod M. Neidt wrote:
> 
> Hi again!
> 
> Didn't see drobbins post before I sent mine.
> 
> Didn't realize that the "_p4" suffix was an option (I learned something
> new today :)  and I personally would prefer that as it is the most
> informative.
> 
> Munging the ebuild to the tarball naming is still a good habit to get
> into as updating the ebuild for _p5, _p6 , etc. would be a simple copy
> of the ebuild to the new name and not require editing any hardcoded
> version in the ebuild itself.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> tod
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 

Thanks to both!

I'll modify my scripts with that insight and send it back inside bugzilla

Yannick Koehler