From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_REJECT, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from carbon.btinternet.com (carbon.btinternet.com [194.73.73.92]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA49D200B260 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:45:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from host62-7-107-96.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([62.7.107.96] helo=beaky) by carbon.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8) id 16kYUc-0002M9-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 22:42:10 +0000 Received: from sparky ([192.168.254.4] helo=btinternet.com) by beaky with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16kYUq-0006EB-00 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 22:42:24 +0000 Message-ID: <3C8D32F2.5000205@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 22:42:58 +0000 From: Ian Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020216 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/init.d References: <3C8CEDD8.2000907@colubris.com> <3C8CF4C5.1050901@colubris.com> <20020311184223.GB28735@rearviewmirror.org> <3C8D0648.6070300@colubris.com> <1015875432.13991.32.camel@wubble.Genuity.COM> <3C8D1DF0.8050700@colubris.com> <20020311220735.GA3420@yggdrasil.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: b0b7ee2b-a3e6-46a3-a6d6-931ebd46a148 X-Archives-Hash: 446fd0100c9dcd5fc6d61a9acf5e53d3 Defresne Sylvain wrote: > Then export CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/init.d" and then /etc/init.d will be > excluded from config file protection ! If you like it, you can add it to > /etc/make.conf ... > > Bye > Ah you've answered my post anyway! Is this documented anywhere? I think at least a blank entry in /etc/make.globals would be useful . . . -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Smith ----------------------------------------------------------------------------