Re: [gentoo-dev] Sandbox suggestion

[Zach Forrest <diatribe@shaw.ca>]

What about installing dyn-bash into something like 
/usr/lib/sandbox/bin/bash, and then pre-pending this to $PATH before 
beginning and restoring the original $PATH afterwards?

Zach

Joshua Pollak wrote:

> On Tuesday 11 December 2001 4:05, you wrote:
> 
>>Because then any script that refers to /bin/bash during the installation
>>process uses the static bash, while the purpose is this the dynamic bash
>>is used. Of course all the scripts could be patched, but then the use of
>>the sandbox gets quite a bit devaluated.
>>
> 
> Fair enough.
> 
> 
>>Joshua Pollak wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Just wondering, but I had a suggestion for the dynamic bash ebuild: Rather
>>>than replacing the static bash and moving the static bash to /bin/sbash
>>>(shouldn't that be /sbin/sbash?) anyway, why not just install the new
>>>shell to /bin/dyn-bash or dbash or something, and make the sandbox
>>>scripts call everything via that shell?
>>>
>>>I'm not sure if that's technically possible or not, but it seemed like it
>>>would make a lot of things simpler, and reduce the risk of sysadmins
>>>messing something up.
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>gentoo-dev mailing list
>>>gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
>>>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>gentoo-dev mailing list
>>gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
>>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 
>