From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from pd2mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (h24-71-223-13.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.13]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5871A690 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 18:19:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from pd4mr4so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.215]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built Dec 14 2000)) with ESMTP id <0GO5000H4KW00Q@l-daemon> for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:19:12 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml5so (pn2ml5so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.149]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built Dec 14 2000)) with ESMTP id <0GO5000GPKW02V@l-daemon> for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:19:12 -0700 (MST) Received: from shaw.ca ([24.68.91.28]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built Dec 14 2000)) with ESMTP id <0GO500AO6KVZOL@l-daemon> for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:19:12 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:22:45 -0800 From: Zach Forrest Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-id: <3C1551D5.1000909@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011130 References: <3C153758.3060208@shaw.ca> <3C153DB5.9090901@theleaf.be> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 53f50f31-078a-4957-b3e0-2c6c722e7a4d X-Archives-Hash: aa8fe493aaf07b88a6509ee3aee5f09a Thanks. Geert Bevin wrote: > Just untar the archive and install with 'ebuild sandbox-0.2.1.ebuild > merge'. This should work. To be completely protected also install the > dynamic bash in a similar way 'ebuild dynbash-2.04.ebuild merge'. Note > that there is a small risk to installing a dynamic bash : updating glibc > afterwards crashes your machine, and updating ncurses and readline > segfaults the running bashes. The static bash is however not removed but > accessible as /bin/sbash. Unmerging the dynbash also puts the default > static bash pack into its place, so you can always revert. > > Zach Forrest wrote: > >> I was wanting to give the new sandbox a try, but I'm not sure how to >> get around package.mask. Does setting MAINTAINER=YES in make.conf have >> anything to do with this? What are the policies on getting CVS access? >> >> Zach > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev >