From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, DMARC_REJECT,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from [24.31.124.104] (helo=jomama.huneycuttfamily.org) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 162b8E-0007Ov-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 09:37:22 -0700 Received: from acm.org (unknown [192.168.1.247]) by jomama.huneycuttfamily.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A411C968; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 07:46:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3BED57AA.4030301@acm.org> From: Chad Huneycutt <chad.huneycutt@acm.org> Organization: Georgia Tech College of Computing User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.5+) Gecko/20011026 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: All Developers! References: <1005392055.10442.2.camel@zoidberg> <20011110165601.1b5869a1.karltk@prosalg.no> <1005406570.28610.0.camel@zoidberg> <m2bsiahaum.fsf@columbus.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Reply-To: chadh@cc.gatech.edu List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>, <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=subscribe> List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list <gentoo-dev.cvs.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>, <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/> Date: Sat Nov 10 09:38:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 11:36:58 -0500 X-Archives-Salt: 2766356a-549b-463f-92a2-c019ef467290 X-Archives-Hash: cf280a583740948cb0afe55057c20b02 Andreas Voegele wrote: BTW, if a single tab was used in front of dependencies the output > would look like this: > > tabwidth 4: > > DEPEND="virtual/glibc > virtual/x11 > RDEPEND="virtual/glibc > virtual/x11 > > tabwidth 8: > > DEPEND="virtual/glibc > virtual/x11 > RDEPEND="virtual/glibc > virtual/x11 > > IMHO both outputs look good, and with this solution developers could > still set the tabwidth to 4 or 8. The problem with tabs comes in when you do stuff like: local t local u t = "some string like this" # comment here u = "some other longer string" # another comment The comments will not necessarily line up when tabwidths are different. Chad