[gentoo-dev] xfree86 4.1.0 ebuild

[gentoo-dev] xfree86 4.1.0 ebuild

[Joe Bormolini]

	Someone came into #gentoo last night saying when trying to merge xfree86
4.1.0, somehow the flag -march=1 got passed to gcc instead of
-march=pentiumpro. Last night I went to build 4.1.0 and had the same
problem. I cannot for the life of me figure out why -march=pentiumpro turns
into march=1. The person on irc also mentioned that changing it to pentium
allowed it to build.

	--lordjoe

Re: [gentoo-dev] xfree86 4.1.0 ebuild

[tadpol]

On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 03:26:27PM +0000, Joe Bormolini wrote:
> 	Someone came into #gentoo last night saying when trying to merge xfree86
> 4.1.0, somehow the flag -march=1 got passed to gcc instead of
> -march=pentiumpro. Last night I went to build 4.1.0 and had the same
> problem. I cannot for the life of me figure out why -march=pentiumpro turns
> into march=1. The person on irc also mentioned that changing it to pentium
> allowed it to build.

I'm seeing this as well in 4.0.3.  from what I can tell, *any* thing you
try to make that uses Imake (and xmkmf) has this problem.  (try to build
media-gfx/xfig for example. You get the same errors.)

-- 
Michael Tilstra                       tadpol@tadpol.org
The sum of the intelligence on a planet is a constant; the population is
growing.

Re: [gentoo-dev] xfree86 4.1.0 ebuild

[Achim Gottinger]

tadpol@tadpol.org wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 03:26:27PM +0000, Joe Bormolini wrote:
> >       Someone came into #gentoo last night saying when trying to merge xfree86
> > 4.1.0, somehow the flag -march=1 got passed to gcc instead of
> > -march=pentiumpro. Last night I went to build 4.1.0 and had the same
> > problem. I cannot for the life of me figure out why -march=pentiumpro turns
> > into march=1. The person on irc also mentioned that changing it to pentium
> > allowed it to build.
> 
> I'm seeing this as well in 4.0.3.  from what I can tell, *any* thing you
> try to make that uses Imake (and xmkmf) has this problem.  (try to build
> media-gfx/xfig for example. You get the same errors.)
> 

Hrm, thats really bad.

some apps worked after I changed pnetiumpro to i686 but we must find the
cause for this problem.
unfortunately the rc5 packages have this problem too.
Can the string2.h fix in glibc cuase such a problem? 
I think this is the only big difference between the last two build
snapshots.

bye achim~

> --
> Michael Tilstra                       tadpol@tadpol.org
> The sum of the intelligence on a planet is a constant; the population is
> growing.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
> http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev