From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, DMARC_MISSING,FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS,FROM_LOCAL_HEX, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.19]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14VZgR-0001ec-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 06:51:56 -0700 Received: from fwd00.sul.t-online.com by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14VZhV-0007rD-01; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:53:01 +0100 Received: from helios.bagwan (320095285153-0001@[217.80.39.136]) by fwd00.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14VZhD-1pLivQC; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:52:43 +0100 Received: (qmail 30839 invoked by uid 0); 21 Feb 2001 16:34:01 -0000 Received: from sadchitananda2.bagwan (HELO gottinger.de) (achim@192.168.2.1) by helios.bagwan with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 16:34:01 -0000 Message-ID: <3A93C1F4.500B4B3C@gottinger.de> From: 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre References: <3A90BA1F.5C3183BD@gottinger.de> <20010221024947.A7139@rouge.snu.ac.kr> <3A937839.697D60A2@gottinger.de> <20010221195604.B9090@rouge.snu.ac.kr> <3A939E66.489E136E@gottinger.de> <20010221204444.A9198@rouge.snu.ac.kr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: 320095285153-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Reply-To: achim@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Feb 21 06:52:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:26:12 +0100 X-Archives-Salt: fab271ff-6674-4640-ba88-1b2d6dea0ce6 X-Archives-Hash: 045ca2c8ff01cab84a42d0568f2d7d72 Kyung-hwan Kim wrote: > > > > After merging binutils-2.10.1.0.7 and everything gose beautifully. > > > But merging glibc-2.2.2, nothing would go its way. > > > > > > Do you mean that packages must be recompiled under glibc-2.2.2 and > > > updated binutils environment? > > No normaly that should not be neccesary. I finished upgrading glibc to 2.2.2 on a pure rc4_pre2 system. I used binutils-2.10.92.0.2 and I had to remove the manually created virtual/glibc dir before I merged glibc. I did not see any segfault yet. achim~ > > > > It seems that the problem is arch dependend. > > > > I use i686-pc-linux-gnu here. The rc4_pre2 packages use > > i486-pc-linux-gnu > > as default. > > > > I currently building glibc-2.2.2-r1 with binutils-2.10.92.0.2 on a pure > > rc4_pre2 machine. I hope that works. > > > > Did the glibc test's fail on your machine when using binutils 2.10.1? > > Yes. :) > > > On a i686 target they do. > > Kyunghwan > > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev