public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are  incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre
Date: Wed Feb 21 04:20:02 2001	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A939E66.489E136E@gottinger.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20010221195604.B9090@rouge.snu.ac.kr

Kyung-hwan Kim wrote:
> 
> > Hmm seems like the uploaded package was build with binutils-2.1.10.
> > I made a new package for binutils-2.1.10.91.0.2 that fixes some ld
> > segfaults.
> > With that binutils version I build a new glibc-2.2.2 package (r1).
> > This should not give you segfaults. It works here for me. But many packages
> > do not compile
> > with glibc-2.2.2 because the headers have changed.
> 
> After merging binutils-2.10.1.0.7 and everything gose beautifully.
> But merging glibc-2.2.2, nothing would go its way.
> 
> Do you mean that packages must be recompiled under glibc-2.2.2 and
> updated binutils environment?
No normaly that should not be neccesary.

It seems that the problem is arch dependend.

I use i686-pc-linux-gnu here. The rc4_pre2 packages use
i486-pc-linux-gnu
as default.

I currently building glibc-2.2.2-r1 with binutils-2.10.92.0.2 on a pure
rc4_pre2 machine. I hope that works.

Did the glibc test's fail on your machine when using binutils 2.10.1?

On a i686 target they do.

achim~
> If so, no non-developer gentoo user can succeed in upgrading glibc.
> 
> Kyunghwan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev



  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-21 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-18 23:42 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre Achim Gottinger
2001-02-20 10:50 ` Kyung-hwan Kim
2001-02-20 22:49   ` Achim Gottinger
2001-02-21  3:50     ` Kyung-hwan Kim
2001-02-21  1:38   ` Achim Gottinger
2001-02-21  3:14     ` Achim Gottinger
2001-02-21  3:56     ` Kyung-hwan Kim
2001-02-21  4:20       ` Achim Gottinger [this message]
2001-02-21  4:44         ` Kyung-hwan Kim
2001-02-21  6:52           ` Achim Gottinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A939E66.489E136E@gottinger.de \
    --to=320095285153-0001@t-online.de \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox