Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre

[320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)]

Achim Gottinger wrote:

> Kyung-hwan Kim wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:15:59AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > During compilation here I found that latest binutils segfault's during
> > > linking of mpeg2_movie so it seems to be abit buggy.
> > >
> > > With Glibc-2.2.2 some packages like daemontools/pam needs to be patched
> > > to compile since there where some so
> > > called header cleanups done in this release.
> > >
> > > Please use glibc-2.2.1 and binutils-2.1.10 until I have updated all
> > > packages that needs patching.
> >
> > I merged glibc-2.2.2 two days ago.
> > Files including ls, make, tar... got segmentation fault and failed.
>
> Hmm seems like the uploaded package was build with binutils-2.1.10.
> I made a new package for binutils-2.1.10.91.0.2 that fixes some ld
> segfaults.
> With that binutils version I build a new glibc-2.2.2 package (r1).
> This should not give you segfaults. It works here for me. But many packages
> do not compile
> with glibc-2.2.2 because the headers have changed.

!!!!! Please wait till tomorrow it seems there is a bug in portage-1.4 that
prevents merge from working.
So this glibc-2.2.2-r1 package was build with binutils-2.1.10 too and you
sould not use it!

achim~

>
>
> achim~
>
> >
> >
> > Is there any dependence about glibc?
> > Or safe way to test new glibc/binutils and packages which is dependent
> > on them?
> >
> > Kyunghwan Kim
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gentoo-dev mailing list
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> > http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev