public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are  incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre
Date: Wed Feb 21 01:38:01 2001	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A937839.697D60A2@gottinger.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20010221024947.A7139@rouge.snu.ac.kr

Kyung-hwan Kim wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:15:59AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > During compilation here I found that latest binutils segfault's during
> > linking of mpeg2_movie so it seems to be abit buggy.
> >
> > With Glibc-2.2.2 some packages like daemontools/pam needs to be patched
> > to compile since there where some so
> > called header cleanups done in this release.
> >
> > Please use glibc-2.2.1 and binutils-2.1.10 until I have updated all
> > packages that needs patching.
>
> I merged glibc-2.2.2 two days ago.
> Files including ls, make, tar... got segmentation fault and failed.

Hmm seems like the uploaded package was build with binutils-2.1.10.
I made a new package for binutils-2.1.10.91.0.2 that fixes some ld
segfaults.
With that binutils version I build a new glibc-2.2.2 package (r1).
This should not give you segfaults. It works here for me. But many packages
do not compile
with glibc-2.2.2 because the headers have changed.

achim~

>
>
> Is there any dependence about glibc?
> Or safe way to test new glibc/binutils and packages which is dependent
> on them?
>
> Kyunghwan Kim
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev




  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-02-21  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-18 23:42 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre Achim Gottinger
2001-02-20 10:50 ` Kyung-hwan Kim
2001-02-20 22:49   ` Achim Gottinger
2001-02-21  3:50     ` Kyung-hwan Kim
2001-02-21  1:38   ` Achim Gottinger [this message]
2001-02-21  3:14     ` Achim Gottinger
2001-02-21  3:56     ` Kyung-hwan Kim
2001-02-21  4:20       ` Achim Gottinger
2001-02-21  4:44         ` Kyung-hwan Kim
2001-02-21  6:52           ` Achim Gottinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A937839.697D60A2@gottinger.de \
    --to=320095285153-0001@t-online.de \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox