From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DMARC_MISSING,FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS,FROM_LOCAL_HEX, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mailout00.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.16]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14VUdA-00019Q-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 01:28:12 -0700 Received: from fwd05.sul.t-online.com by mailout00.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14VUeH-0004EL-03; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:29:21 +0100 Received: from helios.bagwan (320095285153-0001@[217.80.39.136]) by fwd05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14VUe2-0aVebYC; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:29:06 +0100 Received: (qmail 30360 invoked by uid 0); 21 Feb 2001 11:10:23 -0000 Received: from sadchitananda2.bagwan (HELO gottinger.de) (achim@192.168.2.1) by helios.bagwan with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 11:10:23 -0000 Message-ID: <3A93761C.2F50DAD1@gottinger.de> From: 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new packages References: <20010220230226.A1612@cvs.gentoo.org> <3A9356B9.8A5379A0@gottinger.de> <20010220234143.C1612@cvs.gentoo.org> <3A935E98.727A6576@gottinger.de> <20010221000148.A3284@cvs.gentoo.org> <3A93637B.265504B6@gottinger.de> <20010221012529.B3645@cvs.gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: 320095285153-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Reply-To: achim@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Feb 21 01:29:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:02:36 +0100 X-Archives-Salt: fc5f9807-c1d0-4f40-ba8f-5f8b315fd895 X-Archives-Hash: 0a18df55e9e159d70d924da78bc5e2ed Pete Gavin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 07:43:07AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > They're > > > only there to reduce the amount of duplicated code between the > > > hundreds of utilities that are included in the package. I don't know > > > of any packages that link to these libraries, and no header files are > > > installed by netpbm, so I don't know how you could get the prototypes > > > for the functions in the libraries anyways... And imagemagick provides > > > libraries, but its in media-gfx... > > > > I thought we disscussed the media-libs issue. We will change it but for now > > I > > think we should place such stuff to media-libs because the other image libs > > are in there too. > > True imagemagick and gimp provide libs too but in opposit to netpbm they > > offer a GUI interface > > that's why they are in media-gfx. > > > > Ok, I'm gonna remove media-gfx/netpbm, but I'd like to make my version > netpbm-9.10-r2, since I put the extra data stuff in /usr/share/netpbm, > rather than /usr/lib/netpbm, since its just data and not executable > stuff. And the Makefile.config for r1 doesn't give all the proper > paths for the include files and libraries for libpng, jpeg, & tiff. Is > that ok w/ you? > Yes please. achim~ > > Pete > > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev