Re: [gentoo-dev] PGCC

[320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)]

"Jerry A!" wrote:

> Hey Achim, I was looking at using pgcc instead of gcc proper.  So, I've
> hacked up the gcc-2.95.2.1.ebuild file.  Right now, I have it checking
> if "use pgcc" is set.  If so, then it'll apply the patch cleanly.
>
> Here's a list of the changes I've made:
>
> . if/then blocks for "use pgcc"
> . grap gcc-2.95.2.1.tar.gz instead of gcc-2.95.2 + diff file
> . commented out A1 & A2--they appear to only be necessary for 2.95.2
>     I will remove them from the final ebuild before committing if not
>     necessary.
> . commented out A1..A2 patches sections in src_unpack().  Will also be
>     removed pending commit.

Make these patches problems with pgcc? I removed a few other patches which
made it in 2.95.2.1 but these
where not in 2.95.2.1. Thats why they are still there.

>
>
> Is there any reason we don't build the texinfo docs?

? We build texinfo docs but we don't build texinfo because we have a separate
package for that.

I just commited my lates version of gcc 2.95.2.1-r1 which uses the "use
build" if you compile for sys-build
(in this case texinfo gets build).
Should I merge it with your one or can you do it?

achim~

>
>
> Could you please look over this and let me know what you think?
>
>         --Jerry
>
> name:  Jerry Alexandratos         ||  Open-Source software isn't a
> phone: 703.599.6023               ||  matter of life or death...
> email: jerry@thehutt.org          ||  ...It's much more important
>                                   ||  than that!
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    gcc-2.95.2.1.ebuildName: gcc-2.95.2.1.ebuild
>                       Type: Plain Text (text/plain)