From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48, DMARC_MISSING,FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS,FROM_LOCAL_HEX, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mailout00.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.16]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14UjH0-00007G-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 22:54:11 -0700 Received: from fwd02.sul.t-online.com by mailout00.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14UjHi-0007kg-01; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 06:54:54 +0100 Received: from helios.bagwan (320095285153-0001@[217.80.45.66]) by fwd02.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14UjHX-169vbkC; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 06:54:43 +0100 Received: (qmail 27030 invoked by uid 0); 19 Feb 2001 08:35:58 -0000 Received: from sadchitananda2.bagwan (HELO gottinger.de) (achim@192.168.2.1) by helios.bagwan with SMTP; 19 Feb 2001 08:35:58 -0000 Message-ID: <3A90AEEE.13B5A722@gottinger.de> From: 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc build problem in make check References: <20010206142311.C27279@cvs.gentoo.org> <3A8DDF39.83460183@gottinger.de> <20010216220055.A29721@cvs.gentoo.org> <3A8E0614.D61D1201@gottinger.de> <3A8F01E4.CE8FEA6D@gottinger.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: 320095285153-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Reply-To: achim@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Feb 18 22:55:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 06:28:14 +0100 X-Archives-Salt: 50228431-8f8f-4e74-aace-6d0fcde73ab5 X-Archives-Hash: 67922e0ffeb648c6e12040bd2dac5f62 Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > > Since Suse 7.1 ships with 2.4/reiserfs I think this problem is solved. > > Well it seems to be still unsolved. > I tested the lates kernel 2.4.1-ac17 with and without nfs and lvm patches all with > the same result. > I posted a message to the reiserfs mailinglist. > Here are the answers Well, this is known weakness of reiserfs in its current state: it creates very big holes in file very poorly. Thanks, vs This isn't a bug, its a design flaw. reiserfs creates a little slower than ext2 does, and this test is really benchmarking the hole creation speed. We don't do it quickly, but the holes do get created. -chris ------------------- I added a patch to the lates glibc-2.2.2 package that increases the timeout in test-lfs so it should compile. Since there are other problems with glibc-2.2.2/binutils-2.1.10.0.7 I will update glibc-2.2.1 too. achim~