public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] odds and ends
Date: Wed Jan 24 16:38:01 2001	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A6F60ED.CD9098C3@gottinger.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20010124224353.D29166@tsuny.ctn.cogs.susx.ac.uk

Thomas Flavel wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:29:04PM -0700, drobbins@gentoo.org wrote:
>
> > 1.0_rc4-pre2 is fully compatible with all modern Intel and Intel-compatible
> > processors, from the i486 on up.  While 1.0_rc4-pre2 is optimized for the
> > 486, Achim plans to build several different versions of 1.0_rc4 optimized for
> > various processors.  1.0_rc4-pre2 has been tested on K6 systems and works
>
> I don't understand why not a 386? I kind of expected the distcd to be 386
> binaries, and then to compile and install optimised to whatever my processor
> happens to be? What am I mis-understanding? ;)
>
> How would gentoo be installed on a 386?

You can build all the sys packages with a CHOST of i386-pc-linux-gnu and merge them
to some temporary place.
Then chroot there and recompile and remerge all packages. Eighter do this a few times
or follow the dependencies
starting by glibc to be sure you have no statically linked in i486 assembler code in
there. Then you can build the
other stuff you need and you should have a i386 based system.
Do you still use i386 ? My oldest is an i486SX/25 with a 200MB HD running as a
firewall here under gentoo.
The i486 version is definetly slower that the i686 version we had before using i386
won't make things better.
If there really is a need for a i386 version I can build one.

>
>
> > sys-* layout
> > ------------
> >
> > Achim and I have resolved how to determine what goes in the sys-* categories.
> > We are breaking with FreeBSD tradition by making the sys-* categories contain
> > _only_ a barebones, minimal system -- the minimal Gentoo system that can still
> > recompile itself, with a few exceptions.  Previously, what was included in
> > sys-* was more of a subjective thing, i.e. what I would like to see in a basic
> > Gentoo Linux server install, the tools I personally like, etc.
> >
> > Rather than do this, we're going to be integrating some new functionality into
> > Portage that's going to be very, very nice and will allow everyone to have the
> > kind of "base" system that they like.  Portage will recognize your selection not
> > only at install time, but throughout the lifetime of your system, prompting you
> > to upgrade or add new packages when necessary.
>
> Excellent. Roughly what size is minimum now?

Currently about 200MB with lots of package-docs, and the development tools, but if
you unmerge
all sys-devel packages beside the c++-libs and spython remove /usr/doc and /usr/src
and all the static libs in /lib and /usr/lib you only need about 130MB and still have
a runable system. Other optimizations could be turning of building
of localdata-stuff in glibc removing unneccesary zoneinfo and terminfo entrys...

Hmm, maybe we should introduce a new USE flag to trigger build of packages with only
the really neccesary stuff.

~Achim

>
>
> - Tom
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev



  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-01-24 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-24 15:30 [gentoo-dev] odds and ends drobbins
2001-01-24 15:44 ` Thomas Flavel
2001-01-24 16:09   ` drobbins
2001-01-24 16:35     ` Thomas Flavel
2001-01-24 16:39       ` drobbins
2001-01-24 16:38   ` Achim Gottinger [this message]
2001-01-24 16:44     ` Thomas Flavel
2001-01-24 16:44     ` drobbins
2001-01-24 17:01       ` Achim Gottinger
     [not found] <20010124234502.7F94151359@cvs.gentoo.org>
2001-01-25  3:27 ` Robert Schrem
2001-01-25  6:04   ` Achim Gottinger
2001-01-25  6:34     ` Gabriel
2001-01-25  7:25       ` Achim Gottinger
2001-01-25  7:52         ` mats pettersson
2001-01-25  9:48   ` drobbins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A6F60ED.CD9098C3@gottinger.de \
    --to=320095285153-0001@t-online.de \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox