public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Prowse <cokehabit@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Creating a Sketeton System
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:54:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <36babadf0512150654h7a584189i@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <439DD4D9.4070509@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1349 bytes --]

No, only the config files that are in a stage 3 should be left, some of
those will be edited and some will have been upgraded so they should be
left. It would be like emerge --unmerge --shallow world to take you back the
that original state so then any major changes could be made without
reinstalling as you would basically have an upgraded stage 3 after some
unmerging

On 12/12/05, Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> George Prowse wrote:
> > yes but if you extracted a stage on to an already built system you would
> > not only have the the mess there that you wanted to get rid of but also
> > all your config files would revert back to older versions and you'd lose
> > any changes made.
>
> ...
>
> > because i'd rather not use depclean but also depclean doesn't get rid of
> > the configs left by any packages, for instance: if i had xfce on my
> > system before and i did  emerge -C xorg-x11 && emerge depclean xfce
> > would be wiped off but if i emerged xfce again there would still be
> > modified parts that would use the options i selected on the previous
> > version.
>
> It really sounds like you're contradicting yourself here. You don't want
> your config files overwritten, but you don't want your config files used
> when you remerge the packages?
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1746 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-15 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-12  3:13 [gentoo-dev] Creating a Sketeton System George Prowse
2005-12-12  4:53 ` Curtis Napier
2005-12-12  5:21 ` Andrew Muraco
2005-12-12 19:21   ` George Prowse
2005-12-12 19:51     ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-12-15 14:54       ` George Prowse [this message]
2005-12-12  5:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=36babadf0512150654h7a584189i@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=cokehabit@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox