From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdJcd-0003St-Dy for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:42:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJ3fw2Z020019; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:41:58 GMT Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.200]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJ3eEL5001381 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:40:14 GMT Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so18486nfe for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:40:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JioTv4SInK10+Z3JNA8jgmu9dfB3DHQFFxTAKgyUSDlcciATOFCVd/j2l6r/VBLAHwBPBGQx1v8JXNOaDSiUKaqWwBtW+41c8T8PcKtmsQ1Rw5CsNBqYWYpGrEXFj/ogVU+/274oEo85C23xCiTry0y8lBcvSOYUqls1gzufgIU= Received: by 10.48.241.17 with SMTP id o17mr61861nfh; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:40:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.143.15 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:40:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <36babadf0511181940w219cb41bse26c0bc84aa86c2b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:40:14 +0000 From: George Prowse To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain In-Reply-To: <200511181916.18888.cshields@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_7759_12552368.1132371614018" References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <20051119025317.2a8fbddf@snowdrop.home> <36babadf0511181901kb059338v819ee4935c343fb2@mail.gmail.com> <200511181916.18888.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: ec93a80d-f766-482f-8781-9fd68ec68f29 X-Archives-Hash: dc4b5b88d0245bc742a38747571f3f1f ------=_Part_7759_12552368.1132371614018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Yeah, I think a sub-domain may not be a good solution but unfortunately it is the best at present. The site is a good idea but nothing stops it from abuse. The suggestion that people are ATs for a short time before becoming full devs anyway is another reason for them to be give @g.o addresses. Leav= e adminstration to the least and give the specific volunteers with jobs addresses. If the need is to seperate the people with responsibility from those withou= t then there is no real solution but to give them either sub domains or leave them outside the gentoo fold. I think the website is a good idea but it would eventually mean that the AT= s would get the job of testing the packages that the users say are ok so that the devs can concentrate on bugs On 11/19/05, Corey Shields wrote: > > On Friday 18 November 2005 07:01 pm, George Prowse wrote: > > As these would be @gentoo.org > people they would be easier for devrel to tackle. Making them closer unde= r > the gentoo wing justmakes them easier to dicipline. > > No, you misunderstood... In the theoretical site I was describing, they > would > be users.. not @gentoo.org ppl. > > -C > > -- > Corey Shields > Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team > Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees > http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields > > > ------=_Part_7759_12552368.1132371614018 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Yeah, I think a sub-domain may not be a good solution but unfortunately it is the best at present. The site is a good idea but nothing stops it from abuse. The suggestion that people are ATs for a short time before becoming full devs anyway is another reason for them to be give @g.o addresses. Leave adminstration to the least and give the specific volunteers with jobs addresses.

If the need is to seperate the people with responsibility from those without then there is no real solution but to give them either sub domains or leave them outside the gentoo fold.

I think the website is a good idea but it would eventually mean that the ATs would get the job of testing the packages that the users say are ok so that the devs can concentrate on bugs

On 11/19/05, Corey Shields &= lt;cshields@gentoo.org> wrote= :
On Friday = 18 November 2005 07:01 pm, George Prowse wrote:
> As these would be @gentoo.org <http://gentoo.org> people they would be easier for devrel to tackle. Making them closer under the gentoo wing justmakes them easier to dicipline.

No, you misunderstoo= d...  In the theoretical site I was describing, they would
be = users..  not @gentoo.org ppl.
-C

--
Corey Shields
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team
Gentoo Foundation = Board of Trustees
http://www= .gentoo.org/~cshields



------=_Part_7759_12552368.1132371614018-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list