From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EdJcd-0003St-Dy
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:42:39 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJ3fw2Z020019;
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:41:58 GMT
Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.200])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJ3eEL5001381
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:40:14 GMT
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so18486nfe
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:40:14 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=JioTv4SInK10+Z3JNA8jgmu9dfB3DHQFFxTAKgyUSDlcciATOFCVd/j2l6r/VBLAHwBPBGQx1v8JXNOaDSiUKaqWwBtW+41c8T8PcKtmsQ1Rw5CsNBqYWYpGrEXFj/ogVU+/274oEo85C23xCiTry0y8lBcvSOYUqls1gzufgIU=
Received: by 10.48.241.17 with SMTP id o17mr61861nfh;
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:40:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.48.143.15 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:40:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <36babadf0511181940w219cb41bse26c0bc84aa86c2b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:40:14 +0000
From: George Prowse <cokehabit@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain
In-Reply-To: <200511181916.18888.cshields@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_7759_12552368.1132371614018"
References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost>
<20051119025317.2a8fbddf@snowdrop.home>
<36babadf0511181901kb059338v819ee4935c343fb2@mail.gmail.com>
<200511181916.18888.cshields@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: ec93a80d-f766-482f-8781-9fd68ec68f29
X-Archives-Hash: dc4b5b88d0245bc742a38747571f3f1f
------=_Part_7759_12552368.1132371614018
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Yeah, I think a sub-domain may not be a good solution but unfortunately it
is the best at present. The site is a good idea but nothing stops it from
abuse. The suggestion that people are ATs for a short time before becoming
full devs anyway is another reason for them to be give @g.o addresses. Leav=
e
adminstration to the least and give the specific volunteers with jobs
addresses.
If the need is to seperate the people with responsibility from those withou=
t
then there is no real solution but to give them either sub domains or leave
them outside the gentoo fold.
I think the website is a good idea but it would eventually mean that the AT=
s
would get the job of testing the packages that the users say are ok so that
the devs can concentrate on bugs
On 11/19/05, Corey Shields <cshields@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Friday 18 November 2005 07:01 pm, George Prowse wrote:
> > As these would be @gentoo.org <http://gentoo.org> <http://gentoo.org>
> people they would be easier for devrel to tackle. Making them closer unde=
r
> the gentoo wing justmakes them easier to dicipline.
>
> No, you misunderstood... In the theoretical site I was describing, they
> would
> be users.. not @gentoo.org <http://gentoo.org> ppl.
>
> -C
>
> --
> Corey Shields
> Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team
> Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
> http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields
>
>
>
------=_Part_7759_12552368.1132371614018
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Yeah, I think a sub-domain may not be a good solution but unfortunately
it is the best at present. The site is a good idea but nothing stops it
from abuse. The suggestion that people are ATs for a short time before
becoming full devs anyway is another reason for them to be give @g.o
addresses. Leave adminstration to the least and give the specific
volunteers with jobs addresses.<br>
<br>
If the need is to seperate the people with responsibility from those
without then there is no real solution but to give them either sub
domains or leave them outside the gentoo fold.<br>
<br>
I think the website is a good idea but it would eventually mean that
the ATs would get the job of testing the packages that the users say
are ok so that the devs can concentrate on bugs<br><br><div><span class=3D"=
gmail_quote">On 11/19/05, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Corey Shields</b> &=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:cshields@gentoo.org">cshields@gentoo.org</a>> wrote=
:
</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rg=
b(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Friday =
18 November 2005 07:01 pm, George Prowse wrote:<br>>
As these would be @<a href=3D"http://gentoo.org">gentoo.org</a> <<a href=
=3D"http://gentoo.org">http://gentoo.org</a>> people they
would be easier for devrel to tackle. Making them closer under the
gentoo wing justmakes them easier to dicipline.<br><br>No, you misunderstoo=
d... In the theoretical site I was describing, they would<br>be =
users.. not @<a href=3D"http://gentoo.org">gentoo.org</a> ppl.<b=
r><br>-C<br><br>--
<br>Corey Shields<br>Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team<br>Gentoo Foundation =
Board of Trustees<br><a href=3D"http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields">http://www=
.gentoo.org/~cshields</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>
------=_Part_7759_12552368.1132371614018--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list