From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EdJ5I-0008RK-2J
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:08:12 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJ36YXP002131;
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:06:34 GMT
Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.201])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJ31VAL002604
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:01:31 GMT
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so17896nfe
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:01:31 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=CFOGT/vbXzXgv+YvaG+BjrOFatHsQNqccQtY95VRYMG0RSSQsN0gThH7UStfCdVyO3hFLy62+Cfo4Zcvg7E28YkfCfUsog4BURJz5G7hXhouMTDCHzH2kT1LbG5iZ/NohFGN8NJuHhkkzzzilcuTEu7/9uesiqf6mqwf+wMHkzI=
Received: by 10.48.238.19 with SMTP id l19mr58302nfh;
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:01:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.48.143.15 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:01:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <36babadf0511181901kb059338v819ee4935c343fb2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:01:31 +0000
From: George Prowse <cokehabit@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain
In-Reply-To: <20051119025317.2a8fbddf@snowdrop.home>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_7711_19233611.1132369291313"
References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost>
<20051119003803.GD12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org>
<1044169158.20051119031533@gentoo.org>
<200511191334.10158.cshields@gentoo.org>
<20051119025317.2a8fbddf@snowdrop.home>
X-Archives-Salt: 08a1f5de-5b62-4429-a52e-19e389992fb6
X-Archives-Hash: 7c0960f7f35533ace56ec8783dcb37d7
------=_Part_7711_19233611.1132369291313
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
As these would be @gentoo.org <http://gentoo.org> people they would be
easier for devrel to tackle. Making them closer under the gentoo wing just
makes them easier to dicipline.
On 11/19/05, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:34:10 -0800 Corey Shields <cshields@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> | Why not ditch the idea of yellow-starred "arch testers" and make it
> | easy for *all* users to participate in the stability-validation of
> | all of our packages?
>
> We've seen why this won't work in the past... Too few users know how to
> do proper testing. We've had "please keyword, works for me" bugs for
> things that will always segfault on startup. We've had several people
> who think it'd be clever to automate testing reports. We've got enough
> ricers out there that clearly broken things would end up getting "works
> for me" spammed even more than they are already...
>
> --
> Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!)
> Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org <http://gentoo.org>
> Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
>
>
>
>
------=_Part_7711_19233611.1132369291313
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
As these would be @<a href=3D"http://gentoo.org">gentoo.org</a> people they=
would be easier for devrel to
tackle. Making them closer under the gentoo wing just makes them easier
to dicipline.<br><br><div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 11/19/05, <b class=
=3D"gmail_sendername">Ciaran McCreesh</b> <<a href=3D"mailto:ciaranm@gen=
too.org">ciaranm@gentoo.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt=
0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:34:10 -0800 Corey Shields <<a href=3D"mailto:cshi=
elds@gentoo.org">cshields@gentoo.org</a>><br>wrote:<br>| Why not ditch t=
he idea of yellow-starred "arch testers" and make it<br>| easy fo=
r *all* users to participate in the stability-validation of
<br>| all of our packages?<br><br>We've seen why this won't work in the pas=
t... Too few users know how to<br>do proper testing. We've had "please=
keyword, works for me" bugs for<br>things that will always segfault o=
n startup. We've had several people
<br>who think it'd be clever to automate testing reports. We've got enough<=
br>ricers out there that clearly broken things would end up getting "w=
orks<br>for me" spammed even more than they are already...<br><br>
--<br>Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!)<br>Mail =
; : ciaran=
m at <a href=3D"http://gentoo.org">gentoo.org</a><br>Web &=
nbsp; : <a href=3D"http://d=
ev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm">http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
</a><br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>
------=_Part_7711_19233611.1132369291313--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list