From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN, DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from web.local (cpe-24-221-139-152.az.sprintbbd.net [24.221.139.152]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78B7AC5E0 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 22:52:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from apache@localhost) by web.local (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g533qcu01842; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 20:52:38 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: web.local: apache set sender to webbb@desertscenes.net using -f Received: from 192.168.0.6 (SquirrelMail authenticated user webbb) by web.local with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 20:52:38 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <36664.192.168.0.6.1023076358.squirrel@web.local> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 20:52:38 -0700 (MST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC3.1 bootstrap fails From: "Brian Webb" To: In-Reply-To: <200206022332.09275.verwilst@gentoo.org> References: <200206022332.09275.verwilst@gentoo.org> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.6 [cvs]) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 4593f4aa-03a0-41ba-bc16-3821d79c4503 X-Archives-Hash: 819bcbb41291576a57d469c5e69ecaf0 I tried the 1.3-gcc3.1 profile but ran into some problems, and now I can't get any 3.0 profile to work! I first booted from a 1.1a stage1 CD, I then downloaded an untared the 1.3-gcc3.1 stage1, changed the CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS in make.conf to "-march=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe", and bootstrapped. I soon realized that make.profile was pointing to the default profile when it started building gcc-2.95.3. Since this is a 3.1 bootstrap, it seems like the default make.profile link should be to the 3.0 profile instead, but that wasn't a problem. I started over, remembering to change the make.profile link, and bootstrap finished successfully. There were some errors about info files (this was mentioned in a previous email), but I didn't think much of them. Unfortunately, the "emerge system" step failed when building e2fsprogs because it couldn't find makeinfo. While I was trying to figure out how to build makeinfo I decided to "emerge rsync" just in case something had gotten fixed in the last couple of hours ;-). That's when things really fell apart. After that I couldn't get any emerges to work. I kept getting "Couldn't find match for..." from emerge. At this point I decided that something was really messed up, so decided to start over from a more standard gcc-3.1 bootstrap that worked for me just a day or two ago. I have successfully bootstrapped on a similar system using a 1.1a stage1 and the 3.0 make profile as long as I don't change the CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS until the "emerge system" step (after the gcc 3.1 compiler has been built). Unfortunately, this is no longer working either. I now get the "Couldn't find match for..." error messages almost immediately after running bootstrap.sh. The error messages start just after portage has been emerged. Has something recently changed with portage or the gcc 3.0 profile that could have caused this? Any idea how I can fix this? Brian > Would be cool if you could try and bootstrap again with > -fomit-frame-pointer, and now use the 1.3-gcc3.1 tarball from ibiblio > (http://www.ibiblio.org/gentoo/releases/build/) i just made. If it > fails, i guess we should filter out most of the optimisations... I > think the new gcc3.1-compiled tarball will make all the gcc3.1-users > much happier :o) I also updated the packages file from the gcc 3.1 > profile, and the make.defaults. Please keep us posted on any progress!