From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from sc.am (sc.am [66.247.109.82]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E852AC3AB for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 18:04:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 20957 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2002 23:05:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sc.am) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 26 Jul 2002 23:05:48 -0000 Received: from 66.247.109.90 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gregg) by sc.am with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 18:05:48 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3623.66.247.109.90.1027724748.squirrel@sc.am> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 18:05:48 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new package notification From: "Gregg" To: In-Reply-To: <3D41C4E3.2040307@seul.org> References: <2155.12.247.253.40.1027701888.squirrel@sc.am> <2491.12.247.253.40.1027713784.squirrel@sc.am> <3D41B621.2060002@seul.org> <200207262340.38861.arutha@gmx.de> <3D41C4E3.2040307@seul.org> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc: , , Reply-To: gregg@sc.am X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 6818aba0-8dc0-4c61-86df-f28b6e569e0e X-Archives-Hash: c11b56cd8fa5f5025cbc90dfaa4859c1 All I can say is wow :) Ive wanted this for a month now. I ask for it again and everyone steps up. Good job people. This is great. And yeah, /var/cache is where I think it should go. I also agree that gentoolkit would be the proper location for something like this, if they wanted it. Gregg > Alexander Gretencord wrote: >> On Friday 26 July 2002 22:50, Marko Mikulicic wrote: >> >> >>>What about /var/cache for script output ? >>>Or should I leave /root as default ? >> >> >> /root is crap. /var is exactly for this type of data ... > I agree > >> >> >>>I will make an ebuild for it, but I cannot provide hosting. Where >>> should I put it? >> >> >> I think you should try to get this into official portage real soon :) >> Till then I could put it on my page (http://stud.upb.de/~q9tharkun/) >> where I already have my ebuilds (though most of them are now in >> portage anyway) >> >> Just send me a tarball if you'd like me to put it up. >> > > It came up to my mind that such a small tool doesn't like > to be alone, it needs some friends. I thought that the best place > for it would be "gentoolkit". > It is ok Karl? (I have already written the man page :-) > > Marko > > > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev