On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 23:03 -0800, Alec Warner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:59 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 02:32 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > thank you for bringing this to the list. > > > > > > I have the same experience which is the reason why I haven't migrated > > > most of my packages yet (which is not a good move because I also didn't > > > post the problem to the list like I wanted *yet*, I only talked to > > > people via private mail, chat or at FOSDEM about that and was working on > > > a proposal I wanted to show next week when I am hopefully healthy again). > > > > > > > In other words, instead of bringing the problem up to the person who > > created the GLEP and the eclasses and/or community at large, you've been > > conspiring behind their back. Yes, that's really the procommunity > > attitude we expect from Council members. Thanks for showing it again. > > > > This is a bit of a double standard. Either people are 'conspiring behind > your back' or they 'are gathering data for a counterproposal.' There is no > need to paint a negative narrative here. > Yes, I certainly do have a reason to assume positive from someone who apparently mounts a counterproposal without bothering to consider the original reasons. -- Best regards, Michał Górny